23.03.2014 Views

Knowsley Replacement Unitary Development Plan - Knowsley Council

Knowsley Replacement Unitary Development Plan - Knowsley Council

Knowsley Replacement Unitary Development Plan - Knowsley Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HOUSING<br />

HOUSING<br />

Table 5.1: Estimated sources of housing land supply<br />

as at 1st April 2004 (including demolition<br />

replacements - see para. 5.18)<br />

Commitments<br />

Completions 1.4.02 to 31.3.04 897<br />

Existing planning permissions 1,534<br />

as at 31.3.04 (* see note 1 below)<br />

Allocations<br />

Allocations on the Proposals Map 822<br />

(see policy H2)<br />

North Huyton Action Area 1,450 (source<br />

(see policy H3)<br />

of information:<br />

North Huyton<br />

New Deal<br />

- New Future)<br />

Tower Hill, Kirkby Action Area 300<br />

(see policy H3)<br />

South Prescot Action Area 400<br />

(see policy EC5)<br />

<strong>Development</strong> Opportunity Site 225<br />

- Valley Road, Kirkby (policy H4)<br />

Windfall allowance<br />

Allowance for “windfall” provision 1,500<br />

(including recycled demolition sites<br />

and other sources of windfall<br />

provision outside the above areas)<br />

(* see note 2 below)<br />

Total supply 7,128<br />

* Notes:<br />

1. Sites with planning permission as at 1st April<br />

2004 are listed in Appendix 4.<br />

2. "Windfall” sites are defined for the purposes of<br />

this <strong>Plan</strong> as sites which are: not specifically<br />

allocated in the <strong>Plan</strong> (i.e. in policy H2 or H4);<br />

which are outside the Action Areas (policies H3<br />

and EC5); did not have planning permission for<br />

housing development as at 1st April 2004; and<br />

which are completed between 1st April 2004<br />

and 31st March 2016.<br />

5.19<br />

Table 5.1 also includes an allowance of 1,500 for<br />

"windfall" provision. Some of this allowance will, it is<br />

anticipated be taken up by redevelopment of future<br />

demolition sites and it is therefore not easy to predict<br />

precisely what this allowance should be. However,<br />

the figure of 1,500 is considered reasonable given<br />

recent rates of windfall provision on brownfield sites<br />

in past years and the anticipated scale of the<br />

demolition programme outside the Action Areas.<br />

RELEASE OF HOUSING SITES<br />

5.20<br />

The release of sites for housing development will be<br />

guided by the principles set down below.<br />

AVOIDING AN OVER- OR UNDER- SUPPLY<br />

5.21<br />

This will mean ensuring that the rate of development,<br />

when averaged out over the period 2002 to 2016 (or<br />

any five year period within it), does not significantly<br />

differ from the rate of 230 per year net of demolition<br />

replacements. In assessing any planning application<br />

for housing development, the <strong>Council</strong> will have regard<br />

to the rate of development and demolitions that have<br />

taken place from the 1st April 2002 and the volume<br />

and nature of the land supply (in sites which are<br />

allocated and/or with planning permission), and how<br />

these compare with Regional Spatial Strategy<br />

requirements and the other priorities listed in<br />

policy H1.<br />

PROVISION OF A GOOD CHOICE OF SITES TO<br />

MEET HOUSING NEEDS<br />

5.22<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> will seek to ensure that, at any one time,<br />

an adequate stock of land is available to meet<br />

different housing needs, at the right time, in terms of<br />

tenure, type, affordability and location. <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />

applications which meet an identified need (e.g. for<br />

the elderly or for special needs housing) will in many<br />

cases be supported. With regard to point 4 in Policy<br />

H1, the <strong>Council</strong> would - subject to compliance with<br />

other development plan policies - favourably consider<br />

a proposal to meet a specific and urgent housing<br />

need if it would provide housing for the elderly, less<br />

mobile or other special needs group in accordance<br />

with the <strong>Council</strong>’s Supporting People, Homelessness<br />

and/or Housing Strategies.<br />

PROMOTION OF REGENERATION WITHIN<br />

EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND<br />

ACTION AREAS<br />

5.23<br />

Two of the most significant areas of change in the<br />

housing stock will be at North Huyton and Tower Hill,<br />

Kirkby (see policy H3). As referred to above, these<br />

areas are designated as Action Areas in this <strong>Plan</strong>,<br />

within which current master planning exercises are<br />

aiming to transform the built form. In North Huyton,<br />

for example, approximately 1,150 dwellings will be<br />

demolished and 1,450 new dwellings provided.<br />

Regeneration of the housing stock is also a priority in<br />

other regeneration areas with similar but less severe<br />

problems, including other parts of Kirkby,<br />

Stockbridge Village, parts of Huyton, Whiston and<br />

South Halewood, and as part of the regeneration<br />

proposals for South Prescot. The release of land for<br />

housing will therefore be managed in such a way as<br />

to support and encourage the regeneration of<br />

these areas.<br />

A SEQUENTIAL APPROACH TO SITE RELEASE<br />

5.24<br />

In accordance with <strong>Plan</strong>ning Policy Guidance note<br />

3 “Housing”, the sources of land supply identified<br />

primarily use existing buildings or previously<br />

developed (“brownfield”) land, in preference to<br />

greenfield land. The <strong>Council</strong> has carried out an urban<br />

capacity study, which together with similar studies<br />

produced by other authorities on Merseyside (see<br />

footnote 2 ) identifies the potential capacity of<br />

brownfield development land across Merseyside as a<br />

whole (as at April 2003). Taking account of the<br />

findings of this study (and of the other sources of land<br />

identified above), the <strong>Council</strong> considers that there will<br />

be sufficient land from primarily brownfield sources<br />

to meet housing needs through to 2016.<br />

5.25<br />

Greenfield housing developments will only be<br />

permitted where it has been clearly established that<br />

they would form a necessary and supporting element<br />

of wider regeneration proposals which would bring<br />

significant economic, social or environmental benefits<br />

for the community as a whole. Examples of where this<br />

may be the case are the proposed Action Areas in<br />

North Huyton and Tower Hill, Kirkby. It is anticipated<br />

that the emerging master planning exercises for these<br />

areas (described elsewhere in this chapter) could<br />

include, in the context of the overall proposals for<br />

demolition and rebuild, a relatively limited amount of<br />

development on surplus greenfield areas. This is likely<br />

to be necessary to enable the comprehensive<br />

remodelling of the housing stock, and the<br />

transformation of the design and layout of these areas<br />

that is considered to be needed. It is anticipated that<br />

any loss of existing poor quality open spaces in these<br />

areas will be offset by significant investment in and<br />

enhancement of the greenspace network.<br />

5.26<br />

In the 1990s (prior to the publication of <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />

Policy Guidance note 3 "Housing" in 2000) a<br />

significant proportion of the planning permissions<br />

granted for residential development in <strong>Knowsley</strong> were<br />

on greenfield sites. At the start of the <strong>Plan</strong> period<br />

(1st April 2002), much of the land supply committed<br />

by existing permissions was still greenfield.<br />

This meant that in the two-year period up to<br />

31st March 2004, only approximately 50% of<br />

completions have been on brownfield sites. However,<br />

as the <strong>Plan</strong> period progresses, it is expected that the<br />

other, primarily brownfield, sources of provision will<br />

become more dominant, and that, over the <strong>Plan</strong><br />

period as a whole, at least 65% of new development<br />

will be on brownfield sites. This would be consistent<br />

with the Regional Spatial Strategy, which requires<br />

that across Merseyside (excluding Liverpool) at<br />

least 65% of all new homes should be on<br />

“brownfield” land.<br />

2 References: “<strong>Knowsley</strong> Metropolitan Borough <strong>Council</strong>: Urban Housing Capacity Study: Final Report, 2004” White<br />

Young Green and “Merseyside Sub-Region: Urban Housing Potential Study: 2004” White Young Green<br />

36<br />

KNOWSLEY REPLACEMENT UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Adopted June 2006<br />

KNOWSLEY REPLACEMENT UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Adopted June 2006<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!