url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTRODUCTION<br />
People often see political and economic systems<br />
as interrelated and complementary. In the midtwentieth<br />
century, Friedrich Hayek and Milton<br />
Friedman questioned whether political freedom could<br />
survive without economic freedom. 1 Joseph Schumpeter<br />
was pessimistic about the future of capitalism not because<br />
of any weaknesses in the economic system, but because<br />
he believed that the people who benefited from it the<br />
most were unwilling to support it politically. 2 Decades<br />
later, after the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the<br />
breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991 that ended the Cold<br />
War, political scientist Francis Fukuyama called the triumph<br />
of capitalism and democracy the end of history, 3<br />
meaning that capitalism and democracy were the ultimate<br />
evolution of economic and political systems.<br />
Political and economic systems are designed to operate<br />
within a structure of rules—rules that provide the appearance<br />
that leaders make political and economic decisions<br />
based on objective criteria rather than based on payoffs to<br />
cronies who are close to those with political and economic<br />
power. As political scientist Murray Edelman points out, 4<br />
rules not only govern the operation of political and economic<br />
systems, they also have symbolic value. The more<br />
people believe that the system is based on objective and<br />
INTRODUCTION 1