24.04.2014 Views

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

argue for narrow individual interests. In this environment,<br />

economists Barry Weingast, Kenneth Shepsle, and<br />

Christopher Johnsen describe a government engaged in<br />

distributive politics, where people must try to join a group<br />

of cronies in order to receive their share. 3 Such behavior<br />

reinforces cronyism because gaining advantages in a<br />

democratic government requires others’ support.<br />

Recent work in the new institutional economics,<br />

including that of Douglass North, John Wallis, and Barry<br />

Weingast as well as that of Daron Acemoglu and James<br />

Robinson, 4 describes the poor institutions in which rising<br />

to the top of the income distribution depends on political<br />

power and connections rather than economic productivity.<br />

The reliance on connections is cronyism. Acemoglu<br />

and Robinson describe these institutions as extractive<br />

rather than inclusive, 5 so there is an advantage to being a<br />

crony who can extract benefits rather than engage in productive<br />

activity. Majoritarianism leads to cronyism.<br />

64 LIBERALISM AND CRONYISM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!