url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
argue for narrow individual interests. In this environment,<br />
economists Barry Weingast, Kenneth Shepsle, and<br />
Christopher Johnsen describe a government engaged in<br />
distributive politics, where people must try to join a group<br />
of cronies in order to receive their share. 3 Such behavior<br />
reinforces cronyism because gaining advantages in a<br />
democratic government requires others’ support.<br />
Recent work in the new institutional economics,<br />
including that of Douglass North, John Wallis, and Barry<br />
Weingast as well as that of Daron Acemoglu and James<br />
Robinson, 4 describes the poor institutions in which rising<br />
to the top of the income distribution depends on political<br />
power and connections rather than economic productivity.<br />
The reliance on connections is cronyism. Acemoglu<br />
and Robinson describe these institutions as extractive<br />
rather than inclusive, 5 so there is an advantage to being a<br />
crony who can extract benefits rather than engage in productive<br />
activity. Majoritarianism leads to cronyism.<br />
64 LIBERALISM AND CRONYISM