24.04.2014 Views

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 11:<br />

SOCIAL JUSTICE<br />

From a liberal standpoint, social justice means<br />

that the law treats everyone the same and that<br />

the law protects everyone’s basic human rights.<br />

Laws do not discriminate among individuals, and everyone<br />

has an equal opportunity under the law. The term<br />

most often refers to inequities among different classes of<br />

people, typically groups defined by their gender or ethnicity.<br />

However, advocates of social justice often extend<br />

the concept beyond this procedural view of justice to look<br />

at outcomes and to judge people as members of groups<br />

rather than as individuals. Proponents of this view argue<br />

that there is injustice if some groups, on average, have<br />

outcomes worse than those of other groups.<br />

When equality of outcome is the goal, and when people<br />

are judged as members of groups rather than as individuals,<br />

social justice advocates see a role for the government<br />

to intervene to engage in transfers from some groups to<br />

others. Sometimes the transfers are of resources, but often<br />

they are transfers of opportunity, such as creating preferences<br />

for some groups over others or creating quotas for<br />

groups that advocates view as oppressed. When public<br />

policy pursues this outcome-based and group-based view<br />

SOCIAL JUSTICE 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!