url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ecause it permits voluntary exchanges as long as they<br />
do not violate others’ rights.<br />
Modern capitalist economies do not meet this ideal<br />
description of capitalism because they have incorporated<br />
elements of coercion into economic activity. Labor laws,<br />
such as the minimum wage law and professional licensing<br />
requirements, restrict labor transactions; taxes and<br />
transfers take property from some people to give to others;<br />
and the government restricts or prohibits many types<br />
of exchanges. The government requires that automobiles<br />
have seat belts, air bags, and more; it restricts the sale of<br />
prescription drugs and prohibits the sale of many recreational<br />
drugs; and it heavily regulates industries ranging<br />
from air travel to banking. The government heavily taxes<br />
some businesses and subsidizes others. Through these<br />
activities, capitalism has been combined with other economic<br />
systems, perhaps for the public interest, perhaps<br />
not. Government interventions to protect people’s economic<br />
well-being fall under the heading of progressivism.<br />
Government direction of economic activity falls under<br />
the heading of industrial policy. Government ownership<br />
of economic activity—electric utilities, roadways, and<br />
schools are common examples—is socialism. 2<br />
Is a pure form of capitalism, with fully private ownership<br />
of property and in which people interact only<br />
through mutual consent, possible? Two writers who have<br />
made persuasive cases that a purely voluntary society<br />
is possible are David Friedman and Murray Rothbard. 3<br />
Rothbard uses a liberal moral foundation based on<br />
Locke’s ideas to argue that such a political and economic<br />
system is not only possible but is the only ethical way<br />
in which to <strong>org</strong>anize a society. 4 Friedman, on the other<br />
16 LIBERALISM AND CRONYISM