24.04.2014 Views

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecause it permits voluntary exchanges as long as they<br />

do not violate others’ rights.<br />

Modern capitalist economies do not meet this ideal<br />

description of capitalism because they have incorporated<br />

elements of coercion into economic activity. Labor laws,<br />

such as the minimum wage law and professional licensing<br />

requirements, restrict labor transactions; taxes and<br />

transfers take property from some people to give to others;<br />

and the government restricts or prohibits many types<br />

of exchanges. The government requires that automobiles<br />

have seat belts, air bags, and more; it restricts the sale of<br />

prescription drugs and prohibits the sale of many recreational<br />

drugs; and it heavily regulates industries ranging<br />

from air travel to banking. The government heavily taxes<br />

some businesses and subsidizes others. Through these<br />

activities, capitalism has been combined with other economic<br />

systems, perhaps for the public interest, perhaps<br />

not. Government interventions to protect people’s economic<br />

well-being fall under the heading of progressivism.<br />

Government direction of economic activity falls under<br />

the heading of industrial policy. Government ownership<br />

of economic activity—electric utilities, roadways, and<br />

schools are common examples—is socialism. 2<br />

Is a pure form of capitalism, with fully private ownership<br />

of property and in which people interact only<br />

through mutual consent, possible? Two writers who have<br />

made persuasive cases that a purely voluntary society<br />

is possible are David Friedman and Murray Rothbard. 3<br />

Rothbard uses a liberal moral foundation based on<br />

Locke’s ideas to argue that such a political and economic<br />

system is not only possible but is the only ethical way<br />

in which to <strong>org</strong>anize a society. 4 Friedman, on the other<br />

16 LIBERALISM AND CRONYISM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!