url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Holcombe_Cronyism_web
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
suffers from “market failure,” to use the term that economist<br />
Francis Bator and others used. 9 The policy implication<br />
is that government can correct a “market failure” by<br />
reallocating resources as indicated by theoretical models.<br />
The implicit assumption in such analyses is that the<br />
government is an omniscient, benevolent dictator. It has<br />
sufficient information to allocate resources efficiently<br />
(omniscience), it has the desire to allocate resources<br />
efficiently (benevolence), and it has the power to do so<br />
(dictatorship). In the academic literature, this approach<br />
to policy analysis has been referred to as the planner’s<br />
problem. The planner is the omniscient, benevolent dictator<br />
who must find the solution to the optimal allocation<br />
of resources, and economists who frame a planner’s<br />
problem always conclude by showing the planner’s solution.<br />
While this approach has been criticized, 10 it remains<br />
generally accepted in academic economics. Economists<br />
routinely identify inefficiencies in resource allocation<br />
and show what the government needs to do to correct<br />
the inefficiency without analyzing whether the government<br />
has sufficient information and the right incentives<br />
to actually accomplish what the analyst recommends. An<br />
analysis of government decision-making as Mises suggests<br />
shows that the government is not omniscient, it is<br />
not benevolent, and it is not a dictator.<br />
The government is not omniscient. Often, government<br />
decision-makers do not have the necessary information to<br />
implement the recommended policy. Economists assume<br />
that policymakers know people’s preferences, that external<br />
costs can be measured, and that, in general, policymakers<br />
can identify the optimal allocation of resources<br />
in real life that economists have identified in theory.<br />
LAYING A FOUNDATION 11