31.10.2012 Views

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

284 THE TRIUMPH OF EVIL<br />

achieved through heavy investment as opposed to <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> central planning).<br />

However, Bergson (1992) later admitted that his results may have been biased by his<br />

overestimate (and perhaps very large overestimate) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eastern European<br />

capital stock (among o<strong>the</strong>r things). rn particular, he made no adjustment for <strong>the</strong> much<br />

higher cost <strong>of</strong> technology and high-tech capital goods in Eastern Europe resulting from<br />

<strong>the</strong> technological embargo (Parrott, 1985), and he used gross capital stocks that do not<br />

take into consideration <strong>the</strong> higher level <strong>of</strong> depreciation that exists on Eastern European<br />

capital due to <strong>the</strong>ir tendency to keep it in service longer (instead <strong>of</strong> depreciating <strong>the</strong><br />

capital over time, he increased its value with price indexes). He also fa iled to adj ust for<br />

differences in <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> agricultural land and wea<strong>the</strong>r factors in all countries except<br />

<strong>the</strong> Soviet Union, he excluded services such as education and health from <strong>the</strong> analysis<br />

although socialist countries may be more efficient in <strong>the</strong>se areas (which are priorities<br />

in many socialist countries), and he attempted to arbitrarily factor a portion <strong>of</strong> government<br />

administration and capital out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model although he admits <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />

government infrastructure that communist systems are more efficient in administering<br />

(Campbell, 1974). rn addition, by effectively measuring output per employed worker,<br />

he fa iled to adjust for overall system efficiencies in communist countries related to a<br />

higher level <strong>of</strong> employment that is made possible by <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> guaranteed jobs<br />

(which greatly reduce or eliminate unemployment) and extensive childcare netWorks<br />

(whose economies <strong>of</strong> scale may permit more women to be more productively employed<br />

as opposed to individually having to take care <strong>of</strong> children). Moreover, Bergson (1987)<br />

made no adjustment for <strong>the</strong> effect on labor effort <strong>of</strong> differences in worker protection,<br />

environment, and satisfaction, which may be higher in communist countries compared<br />

to o<strong>the</strong>r nations at similar levels <strong>of</strong> development due to <strong>the</strong> communists' pro-worket<br />

philosophy (Adler, 1980). For instance, Bergson ( 1987) did find that an adj ustment for<br />

<strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> labor related to <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> hours worked per worker increased <strong>the</strong><br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product ivity <strong>of</strong> communist labor.<br />

16. Although corruption (including tax evasion and bribery) does exist in communist<br />

systems, communist governments frequently engage in widespread efforts to ro_o1<br />

it out (through imprisonment and expelling corrupt bureaucrats out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> commumst<br />

party), as in <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union under Stalin (Getty, 1985) and in China under . M�o<br />

(Gong, 1994). Corruption does tend to rise when communist countries initiate capitalis­<br />

tic market reforms, as in China in <strong>the</strong> late 1970s (Kwong, 1997) and in <strong>the</strong> Soviet u . nion<br />

in <strong>the</strong> late 1980s (Marcy, 1990). lt should also be mentioned that corruption also ex 1 s � ed<br />

before communism, especially in China. which had a substantial amount <strong>of</strong> corruption<br />

prior to <strong>the</strong> communist seizure <strong>of</strong> power in 1949 (Gong, 1994).<br />

17. Although <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union spent a higher percent <strong>of</strong> GNP on defense than <strong>the</strong><br />

USA, <strong>the</strong> absolute dollar amount was substantially less. It is <strong>the</strong>refore likely that <strong>the</strong><br />

USA could also exist on far lower defense expenditures if it maintained a more defen­<br />

sive foreign policy like <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union did (especially since <strong>the</strong>re would be no o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

world power to threaten it), <strong>the</strong>reby fur<strong>the</strong>r lowering <strong>the</strong> tax bite. Moreover, given <strong>the</strong><br />

USA's enormous nuclear arsenal and overwhelming military power, it is very unlikely<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re would be any foreign invasions to prompt <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> destructive civil war<br />

which occurred after <strong>the</strong> communist revolution in Russia in 1917 and which reduced<br />

national income <strong>the</strong>re by about half. Instead, if <strong>the</strong> USA were to choose a communist<br />

path, <strong>the</strong>re would be no more USA economic, military, political, and subversive (i.e.,<br />

NOTES 285<br />

CIA) pressure for <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world to remain capitalist (Blum, 1995), and it is<br />

quile possible that a large number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries would tum toward a communist<br />

system.<br />

1 8. For example, <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union typically spent only I% <strong>of</strong> GNP on government<br />

ldministration vs. 3% for <strong>the</strong> USA (Campbell, 1974). rt should also be noted that <strong>the</strong><br />

lack <strong>of</strong> unemployment in communist countries would eliminate <strong>the</strong> taxes that have to<br />

be paid under USA capitalism for <strong>the</strong> unemployed. Fur<strong>the</strong>r evidence on <strong>the</strong>se issues<br />

�provided by communist China. whose government spending (including not only for<br />

ldministration but also for defense and various government services) represents only<br />

16% <strong>of</strong> economic output. and <strong>the</strong> overall tax burden <strong>the</strong>re is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowest in <strong>the</strong><br />

world (Forney, 2000).<br />

19. The nontrivial risk <strong>of</strong> falling into poverty can be illustrated by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

tnAmericans who go quickly from very good-payingjobs (such as S 125,000 annually)<br />

to being unemployed and homeless, and by <strong>the</strong> fact that even working people earning<br />

over $30,000 per year <strong>of</strong>ten live in poverty and sometimes go homeless because land­<br />

kxds require a good credit history as well as high current income to ensure payment <strong>of</strong><br />

rmt (Wuhington Post. 2000). It should be noted that <strong>the</strong> latter figure is <strong>the</strong> approximate<br />

median income for USA fam ilies (Phillips, 2000).<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

I. While West Germany did eventually pay out DM72 billion for war-related crimes<br />

lid debts, including for some pre-war debts <strong>of</strong> Nazi Germany that were largely forgiven<br />

by <strong>the</strong> rich West (Faber, 1990), and while <strong>the</strong> united Germany continues to make some<br />

WW-rellteci payments (Winestock, 2000), <strong>the</strong> amounts were spread over very many<br />

l"** (Merkel and Wahl, 1991) and <strong>the</strong>refore amounted to only a small portion <strong>of</strong> West<br />

�GNP each year. Assuming an average payment <strong>of</strong> DM2 billion per year begin<br />

DII&m 1953 were invested at 18% instead <strong>of</strong> paid out for war-related crimes and debts,<br />

11111<br />

-.ning <strong>the</strong> earnings (based on <strong>the</strong> same 18% interest rate) from <strong>the</strong> capital accu­<br />

� after 36 years were paid out in 1989 (and each year <strong>the</strong>reafter), West German<br />

IIICOme per capita wou ld have been only about 1/3 higher. Comparing this figure to <strong>the</strong><br />

. :.Ciplta East German figures estimated to have existed without reparations indicates<br />

Inti German per capita income in 1989 to still have been far higher at 5- 10 times <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> West German per capita income. In order to provide just compensation here, it<br />

� be necessary for <strong>the</strong> West Germans to pay <strong>the</strong> East Germans an lllmJil amount<br />

ClCecds <strong>the</strong>ir own current GNP. For <strong>the</strong> very reason that an annual payment in<br />

:- 0� GNP would not be possible, it would be necessary for <strong>the</strong> West Germans<br />

. fllllllilh<br />

.• more efficient economic system (like communism) so that <strong>the</strong>y could<br />

::-e <strong>the</strong>rr GNP sufficiently to be able to afford fair compensation to <strong>the</strong> East Ger-<br />

� lnllltion first �red in East Germany after <strong>the</strong> currency uni� that replaced <strong>the</strong><br />

Gennan �arlc With <strong>the</strong> West German Mark in 1990. Accordtng to <strong>the</strong> German<br />

�<br />

in 1991btnk. pnces were 14% higher in eastern Germany with <strong>the</strong> West Ge� n Mark<br />

(Nata than <strong>the</strong>y were under <strong>the</strong> old system with <strong>the</strong> old East German Mark m 1990<br />

tifold . Da,tsch_land, 1991 ), and <strong>the</strong>se figures do not even include <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mulian...<br />

..� 10 rents that occurred subsequently (and o<strong>the</strong>r factors that are analyzed<br />

�� 4 1o more detail).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!