31.10.2012 Views

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 THE TRIUMPH OF EVIL<br />

extermination policies, but instead by poor living conditions that can<br />

be attributed to <strong>the</strong> capitalist system which put a positive value on <strong>the</strong><br />

slaves' lives but not high enough to provide <strong>the</strong>m with adequate food,<br />

water, quarters, medicine, and sanitary conditions (Miller, 1988). To<br />

provide perspective here, it should be mentioned that <strong>the</strong>re is some evidence<br />

that <strong>the</strong> death rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "free" white crew members who transported<br />

<strong>the</strong> slaves was about as high as that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slaves (Curtin, 1969),<br />

providing an indication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relative value (and <strong>the</strong> kill rate) <strong>of</strong> workers<br />

in general under capitalism (but not implying a general intent to kill<br />

<strong>the</strong>m).9<br />

From a legal perspective, <strong>the</strong> primary reason for not including deaths<br />

related to pure economic exploitation in <strong>the</strong> atrocity count is <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that deliberately killing workers (even one's own slaves), was generally<br />

against <strong>the</strong> law, even though such murder was only a misdemeanor in<br />

<strong>the</strong> USA when <strong>the</strong> victim was a slave (Nicholson, 1994). Thus, under<br />

this legal framework, <strong>the</strong> massive deaths resulting from capitalist economic<br />

exploitation are not considered intentional killings. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

executions <strong>of</strong> runaway slaves are (although <strong>the</strong> numbers are too small<br />

relative to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r USA mass murders to be listed separately in Table I<br />

and are instead essentially incorporated into <strong>the</strong> "O<strong>the</strong>r" account), just<br />

as <strong>the</strong> mass slaughter <strong>of</strong> civilians <strong>of</strong> specific countries with bombings<br />

and embargoes is counted as deliberate murder because it was not only<br />

allowed but even ordered by <strong>the</strong> USA (and killing Indians in any fa shion<br />

was obviously even more deliberate ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it was not only legal<br />

but also encouraged by <strong>the</strong> USA with rewards <strong>of</strong> money and land).<br />

CAVEATS ON THE REPUTATION OF COMMUNIST ATROCITIES<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> distorted reputation <strong>of</strong> communist countries in <strong>the</strong> capitalist<br />

press (Herman and Chomsky, 1988), some may find it surprising that<br />

no communist countries made <strong>the</strong> top ten, especially since even many<br />

skeptics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mainstream media (and left-wing critics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> USA)<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten recite <strong>the</strong> anticommunist propaganda <strong>the</strong>y hear in <strong>the</strong> mainstream<br />

press, such as by referring to <strong>the</strong> Union <strong>of</strong> Soviet Socialist Republics<br />

(USSR) as "one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twentieth century's most bloody dictatorships"<br />

(Str � bel and Peterson, 2000). However, <strong>the</strong> widespread belief that com-<br />

. mumst governments have killed millions is largely a myth that is spread<br />

by th � capi�list press, which is heavily influenced by <strong>the</strong> CIA and its<br />

fanatical anticommunist allies (Blum, 1995).'0<br />

INTRODUCTION 53<br />

For example, many blame Pol Pot for <strong>the</strong> deaths <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> his<br />

own people during his rule <strong>of</strong> Cambodia between 1975 and 1979, with<br />

some being executed for collaborating in <strong>the</strong> USA's murder <strong>of</strong> a half<br />

million Cambodian civilians through aerial bombardments, and with<br />

many more being killed for attempting a coup against him in reaction to<br />

his military attacks on Vietnam revolving around a border dispute (Kiernan,<br />

1996). However, <strong>the</strong> neutral Finnish Inquiry Commission investigated<br />

and fo und that <strong>the</strong> number executed by Pol Pot was only between<br />

75,000 and 150,000 (Herman and Chomsky, 1988).<br />

While it is true that hundreds <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> Cambodians died <strong>of</strong><br />

starvation and disease under Pol Pot's regime, <strong>the</strong>se deaths do not<br />

appear to be any more deliberate than <strong>the</strong> poor who die <strong>of</strong> similar causes<br />

under capitalism. In fact, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se deaths were <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

USA bombings <strong>the</strong>mselves, which had destroyed Cambodian agriculture<br />

(via <strong>the</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> 75% <strong>of</strong> its draft animals and substantial<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> rural housing, as well as <strong>the</strong> depopulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> countryside<br />

that resulted from millions fleeing to <strong>the</strong> cities to escape <strong>the</strong> USA<br />

bombings). Despite a forecast by sources close to <strong>the</strong> USA government<br />

that a million people would die in 1975 if Cambodia were deprived<br />

<strong>of</strong> USA aid (which had been partially feeding <strong>the</strong> starving, refugeeswollen<br />

cities before Pol Pot seized power), <strong>the</strong> USA not only stopped<br />

aid after Pol Pot became ruler but also imposed an embargo against <strong>the</strong><br />

country it had so terribly bombed (Herman and Chomsky, 1988). Some<br />

imports <strong>of</strong> food from communist China and Pol Pot's forcing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city<br />

dwellers to <strong>the</strong> farms shortly after his takeover in 1975 prevented <strong>the</strong><br />

disaster from being any worse (Kiernan, 1996).<br />

It should also be mentioned that, subsequent to Pol Pot's removal<br />

from power (which occurred after <strong>the</strong> Vietnamese army counterattacked<br />

and occupied Cambodia in 1979), <strong>the</strong> USA supported Pol Pot in his<br />

guerrilla war against <strong>the</strong> occupying Vietnamese troops (Blum, 1995). In<br />

addition, given <strong>the</strong> USA history <strong>of</strong> using diplomacy, bribes, and extor­<br />

tion to stir up tensions between communist countries (Griswold, 1972),<br />

it is possible that <strong>the</strong> USA itself had played a part in promoting <strong>the</strong><br />

deadly rivalry between Cambodia and Vietnam that motivated many <strong>of</strong><br />

Pol Pot's killings (Klingh<strong>of</strong>fer, 1998). Regardless, Pol Pot's execution<br />

<strong>of</strong> 75,000- 150,000 people is a horrible crime, although it is not enough<br />

to make <strong>the</strong> top ten. 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!