31.10.2012 Views

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

austin-murphy-the-triumph-of-evil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

298<br />

THE TRIUMPH OF EVIL<br />

�<br />

ent, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> labor per unit <strong>of</strong> capital employed, and <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> capital<br />

(t.e., <strong>the</strong> technology level) than <strong>of</strong> financial efficiency.<br />

II. This <strong>of</strong>ficial economic blackmail was supported by a massive number <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

militant threats <strong>of</strong> physical violence made un<strong>of</strong>ficially and illegally against rep<br />

resentatives <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r political parties, especially against <strong>the</strong> communists (Der Tagesspiegel,<br />

1990n), who never<strong>the</strong>less mustered almost 20% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vote, and who have continued<br />

to receive about 115 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vote in eastern Germany throughout <strong>the</strong> subsequent<br />

elections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s (Autorenkollektiv, 1995).<br />

12. An indication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> West German election strategy is pro<br />

vided in surveys. In mid-December 1989, 71% <strong>of</strong> all East Germans were in fa vor <strong>of</strong><br />

Socialism, and 73% were fo r preserving <strong>the</strong> East German state independent <strong>of</strong> West<br />

Gennany (Bahrmann and Links, 1994). By February 1990, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> East Gennans<br />

in fa vor <strong>of</strong> unification had risen dramatically to 76%, although only II% would have<br />

voted for <strong>the</strong> West German conservative parties at that time (Der Tagesspiegel, 1990g).<br />

13. Surveys <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Eastern European countries reveal similar levels <strong>of</strong> dissatisfaction<br />

with capitalism, with at least half <strong>of</strong> all Eastern Europeans believing that <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

better <strong>of</strong>f under communism (Investors Business Dai�y, 1993). Capitalist media propaganda,<br />

<strong>the</strong> costs and risks associated with turning back, threats <strong>of</strong> Western boycotts, and<br />

political repression have so far kept Eastern European countries from returning to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

prior system, as explained throughout this book.<br />

14. The destruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy in <strong>the</strong> eastern provinces is also used to make<br />

<strong>the</strong> residents <strong>the</strong>re feel inferior, subservient, and powerless. A typical example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

misleading nature <strong>of</strong> this psychological warfare can be fo und in <strong>the</strong> agricultural sector,<br />

where heavy West German government subsidization <strong>of</strong> family fa rms (Economist, 1991)<br />

made it very difficult for <strong>the</strong> East German collective fa rms to compete in <strong>the</strong> New Order<br />

<strong>of</strong> "free trade." As a result, agricultural production fe ll by 1/3 in <strong>the</strong> eastern provinces<br />

in <strong>the</strong> year after unification (Frankfu rter Allgemeine, 1991 ). According to conservative<br />

West German propagandists, this collapse <strong>of</strong> East German agriculture stemmed from<br />

<strong>the</strong> "inefficiency" <strong>of</strong> collective farms! While East German agricultural output per hectare<br />

<strong>of</strong> land and per fa nn worker was significantly less than in West Germany, even West<br />

Gennan anticommunists admit that one contributing cause was <strong>the</strong> far lower level <strong>of</strong><br />

mechanization <strong>of</strong> East German fa rms (Thiele, 1998). This situation in turn reflected <strong>the</strong><br />

lower level <strong>of</strong> capital and wealth in East Germany in general (stemming, once again,<br />

from its reparations payments), so that East German agriculture and collectivization<br />

may very well have been very efficient for its level <strong>of</strong> resources. For instance, East Ger­<br />

many had only 1/6 as many harvest combines per acre as West Germany in <strong>the</strong> 1980s<br />

(Kusch et at., 1991) but harvested about Yz as much agricultural output per fann worker<br />

(Thiele, 1998). Some studies have indeed discovered Eastern European agricultural col­<br />

lectives to be relatively efficient (Meurs, 1999), including in East Germany (Gregory<br />

and Leptin, 1977), and even in cases where private fa rming has appeared to be more<br />

productive, <strong>the</strong> cause may well be better land and wea<strong>the</strong>r, more mechanization, and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r input advantages, as Thiele and Brodersen ( 1999) found when comparing agricultural<br />

productivity in eastern and western Germany.<br />

15. These figures represent additional amounts that would have to be spent over and<br />

above <strong>the</strong> costs that are currently being incurred for <strong>the</strong>se undesirable characteristics<br />

NOTES 299<br />

<strong>of</strong> capitalism. For instance, in <strong>the</strong> capitalist USA, over 10% <strong>of</strong> GDP is currently spent<br />

or lost due to crime. In particular, approximately 2% <strong>of</strong> GDP is spent on public Jaw­<br />

enforcement (including for over half a million public police, as well as for criminal<br />

court and prison costs), approximately 3% <strong>of</strong>GDP is lost in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> stolen property<br />

(lqely paid for by higher insurance premiums), and about 5% <strong>of</strong>GDP is lost due to <strong>the</strong><br />

medical costs, suffering, and lost wages <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong> violent crime (US News & World<br />

RtpOrl, 1994). Ano<strong>the</strong>r 1% <strong>of</strong>GDP is spent on private security, including for well over<br />

a million security guards (Reynolds, 1994). Evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that capitalism causes<br />

crime is provided by Japan, which has moved toward a more ·market-oriented society<br />

in <strong>the</strong> 1990s with all its side-effects <strong>of</strong> unemployment and homelessness, and <strong>the</strong> result<br />

hiS been an enonnous increase in crime (Tyson, I 998).<br />

16. Legal proceedings have actually found corruption among <strong>the</strong> East German lead­<br />

en to� fa ir� trivial (in comparison to <strong>the</strong> corruption in West Germany or America),<br />

�lly tnvolvmg only privileged use <strong>of</strong> vacation spots in East Germany, or acceptance<br />

<strong>of</strong> g�fts from <strong>the</strong> West, whose value could be measured in thousands <strong>of</strong> Marks (Krenz,<br />

1990).<br />

CHAPTER 5<br />

': Having first fa llen by over 40% to under 2/5 that <strong>of</strong> western German output per<br />

Clplll between 1989 and I 991 (back to <strong>the</strong> 1960 ratio), output per capita in eastern<br />

�y expe�enced a brief rapid spurt <strong>of</strong> growth in <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s (driven by tax­<br />

llltCnt<br />

tves � vtded by <strong>the</strong> united German government to invest into eastern Gennany).<br />

However, th1s short-term rapid growth raised output per capita to only about half that<br />

<strong>of</strong> western Gennany where it has since stabilized at a level well below <strong>the</strong> 2/3 ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

1989.<br />

2· Deviations between market exchange rates and purchasing power parity exchange<br />

Illes � occur not only due to barriers to trade (including transportation costs and<br />

�ettng/distribution expenses, as well as artificial barriers such as tariffs and quotas)<br />

1 �� due to <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> nontradable goods and services like housing (Kravis and<br />

�y . 1988).<br />

ld�· Si m ply giving citizens shares in state-owned companies that <strong>the</strong>y can immediately<br />

may � t only lead to mass sales at distressed prices but might also cause excessive<br />

= � <strong>the</strong> German government sell <strong>of</strong>f all state-owned assets as soon as possible to<br />

�on and inftation (Ciampi, 1 998). The plan actually used in eastern Gennany<br />

and utilized <strong>the</strong> very limited proceeds from this distressed sale <strong>of</strong> capi­<br />

111 to 1�estors<br />

!lill �� r educe <strong>the</strong> enormous costs <strong>of</strong> unification incurred Although <strong>the</strong> overall<br />

ilitiatt �-y fl<br />

oretut, almost all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing capital stock in <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> Germany<br />

led to a depression which resulted in Jess outside capital investment than<br />

� (199�) r �rts that <strong>the</strong> Deutsche Bank and five o<strong>the</strong>r Gennan institutes<br />

4. OWrled by entities outside eastern Germany (Der Spiegel, 1997b).<br />

� <strong>the</strong> dechne m real GNP to be over 400/o in eastern Germany in 1990-9 1.<br />

E..t �cial �erman government sources indicate National Income in <strong>the</strong> former<br />

'-ea. 198 provmces to have fallen from only 275 billion Marks to 181 billion Marks<br />

._by 9 . and I 99 I (Statistisches Bundesamt, 1 992), prices in eastern Gennany<br />

0enn1n -;,:'':"" ted 13 .8% over that same 2-year interval, as estimated by five West<br />

ctal and economic research institutions (Osmond, 1992). In real terms

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!