Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. The Numerus Clausus and <strong>Party</strong> <strong>Autonomy</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Law</strong> of <strong>Property</strong><br />
Both terms raise the question of the scope of this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of Dutch<br />
property law. Interpreted narrowly, the numerus clausus concerns the<br />
categories and types of iura <strong>in</strong> re aliena, limited real rights <strong>in</strong> the property<br />
of another (beperkte rechten, here<strong>in</strong>after “limited property rights”).<br />
Interpreted more widely, the numerus clausus also concerns the content<br />
of full ownership rights <strong>in</strong> (volledige rechten) both tangible assets (zaken,<br />
or “th<strong>in</strong>gs”), whether movable or immovable, and <strong>in</strong>tangible assets such<br />
as shares, debts (vorder<strong>in</strong>gen) and <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights. 9 The term<br />
‘closed system’ may also be taken to refer to other rules and concepts of<br />
property law, such as those perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to how a property right (goederenrechtelijk<br />
recht) can be acquired or lost and a power over one’s property can<br />
be conferred on someone else.<br />
3.2. The foundations of the numerus clausus<br />
Several articles <strong>in</strong> the 1992 Burgerlijk Wetboek enshr<strong>in</strong>e the numerus clausus<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ciple more or less explicitly, where they refer generally to types of<br />
property rights and types of situations that have a statutory basis. Article<br />
3:81(1) BW, a provision <strong>in</strong> the part of the code conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g general rules<br />
on the acquisition of property rights, implicitly requires a statutory basis<br />
for each type. It states:<br />
‘He who is entitled to an <strong>in</strong>dependent and transferable right can,<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the boundaries of that right, create the limited property rights<br />
that are mentioned by statute.’ 10<br />
This article on the types of property rights – sometimes referred to by the<br />
German word Typenzwang – is thought to reflect most clearly the existence<br />
of the numerus clausus <strong>in</strong> the Dutch law of property. 11 The article<br />
9<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the 1992 Burgerlijk Wetboek entered <strong>in</strong>to force on 1 January 1992,<br />
the term ownership (eigendom) has, strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g, applied only to tangible<br />
property and not to <strong>in</strong>tangible property, such as debts and <strong>in</strong>tellectual property<br />
rights.<br />
10<br />
Article 3:81(1) BW reads <strong>in</strong> Dutch: ‘Hij aan wie een zelfstandig en overdraagbaar<br />
recht toekomt, kan b<strong>in</strong>nen de grenzen van dat recht de <strong>in</strong> de wet<br />
genoemde beperkte rechten vestigen.’<br />
11<br />
Two other articles conta<strong>in</strong> rules bear<strong>in</strong>g some resemblance to the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of<br />
numerus clausus: Article 3:277(1) BW refers to the equality between creditors<br />
T.H.D. Struycken 61<br />
© sellier. european law publishers<br />
www.sellier.de