17.05.2014 Views

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. The Numerus Clausus and <strong>Party</strong> <strong>Autonomy</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Law</strong> of <strong>Property</strong><br />

Both terms raise the question of the scope of this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of Dutch<br />

property law. Interpreted narrowly, the numerus clausus concerns the<br />

categories and types of iura <strong>in</strong> re aliena, limited real rights <strong>in</strong> the property<br />

of another (beperkte rechten, here<strong>in</strong>after “limited property rights”).<br />

Interpreted more widely, the numerus clausus also concerns the content<br />

of full ownership rights <strong>in</strong> (volledige rechten) both tangible assets (zaken,<br />

or “th<strong>in</strong>gs”), whether movable or immovable, and <strong>in</strong>tangible assets such<br />

as shares, debts (vorder<strong>in</strong>gen) and <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights. 9 The term<br />

‘closed system’ may also be taken to refer to other rules and concepts of<br />

property law, such as those perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to how a property right (goederenrechtelijk<br />

recht) can be acquired or lost and a power over one’s property can<br />

be conferred on someone else.<br />

3.2. The foundations of the numerus clausus<br />

Several articles <strong>in</strong> the 1992 Burgerlijk Wetboek enshr<strong>in</strong>e the numerus clausus<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciple more or less explicitly, where they refer generally to types of<br />

property rights and types of situations that have a statutory basis. Article<br />

3:81(1) BW, a provision <strong>in</strong> the part of the code conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g general rules<br />

on the acquisition of property rights, implicitly requires a statutory basis<br />

for each type. It states:<br />

‘He who is entitled to an <strong>in</strong>dependent and transferable right can,<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the boundaries of that right, create the limited property rights<br />

that are mentioned by statute.’ 10<br />

This article on the types of property rights – sometimes referred to by the<br />

German word Typenzwang – is thought to reflect most clearly the existence<br />

of the numerus clausus <strong>in</strong> the Dutch law of property. 11 The article<br />

9<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the 1992 Burgerlijk Wetboek entered <strong>in</strong>to force on 1 January 1992,<br />

the term ownership (eigendom) has, strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g, applied only to tangible<br />

property and not to <strong>in</strong>tangible property, such as debts and <strong>in</strong>tellectual property<br />

rights.<br />

10<br />

Article 3:81(1) BW reads <strong>in</strong> Dutch: ‘Hij aan wie een zelfstandig en overdraagbaar<br />

recht toekomt, kan b<strong>in</strong>nen de grenzen van dat recht de <strong>in</strong> de wet<br />

genoemde beperkte rechten vestigen.’<br />

11<br />

Two other articles conta<strong>in</strong> rules bear<strong>in</strong>g some resemblance to the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of<br />

numerus clausus: Article 3:277(1) BW refers to the equality between creditors<br />

T.H.D. Struycken 61<br />

© sellier. european law publishers<br />

www.sellier.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!