Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D. Assignment; F<strong>in</strong>ancial Instruments; Insolvency <strong>Law</strong><br />
lems s<strong>in</strong>ce the parties have the freedom to submit disputes to the courts<br />
of their jurisdiction of choice. 55<br />
Secondly, if only Dutch parties are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the collateral arrangement,<br />
it may be beneficial not to choose English or New York law but to<br />
adapt the ISDA documentation for Dutch law. If this is comb<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />
a submission to the jurisdiction of the Dutch courts, this may sometimes<br />
lead to substantial cost benefits, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the precise circumstances<br />
of the case. Dutch law offers sufficient flexibility to have the ISDA documentation<br />
governed by Dutch law, although it would need some m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
amendments. However, no problems would arise either <strong>in</strong> terms of contract<br />
law or <strong>in</strong> terms of proprietary issues. Ultimately, whether English,<br />
New York law or Dutch law is most suitable for the parties would be a<br />
matter of preference. I have of course focused on English (and to a lesser<br />
extend New York law) because that is where problems might be expected<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms of party autonomy (although, as I have argued, such problems are<br />
largely absent). As regards Dutch law, there would be no issues <strong>in</strong> terms<br />
of party autonomy and therefore Dutch law <strong>in</strong> this respect has not been<br />
dealt with <strong>in</strong> any detail <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally it may be of <strong>in</strong>terest to know that Euroclear Bank, which is located<br />
<strong>in</strong> Brussels, Belgium, offers various services to market participants<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms of both cash and securities collateral arrangements. Euroclear<br />
Bank is often seen by market participants as a safe entity to use when<br />
plac<strong>in</strong>g the relevant collateral. Euroclear Bank’s services can help reduce<br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrative tasks for the collateral provider and collateral taker. It also<br />
means that parties us<strong>in</strong>g these services may prefer Belgian law as the law<br />
applicable to their collateral arrangement and submit to the jurisdiction<br />
of the courts of Belgium. 56<br />
55<br />
See Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44 / 2001 of 22 December 2000<br />
on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments <strong>in</strong> civil and<br />
commercial matters. See Hudson 2009, § 6-27.<br />
56<br />
Euroclear Bank’s website: https: // www.euroclear.com / site / publishedFile?D<br />
ocumentName=MA0060 Collateral management broch_tcm86-132206.<br />
pdf&action=dload.<br />
248<br />
Re<strong>in</strong>out M. Wibier<br />
© sellier. european law publishers<br />
www.sellier.de