17.05.2014 Views

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C. Developments and Prospects <strong>in</strong> Europe and <strong>in</strong> European <strong>Law</strong> Projects<br />

Member States that did participate <strong>in</strong> the debates on assignment had<br />

various reasons for do<strong>in</strong>g so. Some had an important f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>dustry to<br />

protect and facilitate. This applied, for <strong>in</strong>stance, to the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

and the Netherlands, whose banks and lawyers were both deeply <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> complex structured f<strong>in</strong>ance products. Their respective governments<br />

thought this f<strong>in</strong>ancial trade deserved protection and support by hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

choice-of-law rule stimulat<strong>in</strong>g rather than complicat<strong>in</strong>g their f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Others happened to have an expert delegate: for example, a legal<br />

scholar who could contribute dogmatic arguments to the debate. F<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />

some Member States wanted to protect their exist<strong>in</strong>g national choiceof-law<br />

rule on third-party effects, or to prevent the application of their<br />

national substantive laws on assignment becom<strong>in</strong>g rarely used if a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

choice-of-law rule were to be adopted.<br />

To determ<strong>in</strong>e the Dutch position <strong>in</strong> the debate, I consulted on a regular<br />

basis <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>gs, by email, and by telephone with f<strong>in</strong>ancial experts<br />

from banks, law firms, and universities to learn the key po<strong>in</strong>ts for the<br />

Netherlands. Dur<strong>in</strong>g negotiations, a delegation can participate <strong>in</strong> the<br />

discussions by mak<strong>in</strong>g written proposals. In the case of Article 14 Rome<br />

I, we cont<strong>in</strong>uously stressed the needs of the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry and legal<br />

practice, giv<strong>in</strong>g examples and demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the practical consequences<br />

of the proposed rules.<br />

However, even with few Member States, Brussels discussions sometimes<br />

are rem<strong>in</strong>iscent of the tower of Babel. It is not so much the language itself<br />

that causes confusion; rather, the completely different national legal concepts<br />

we use <strong>in</strong> substantive law cause us problems <strong>in</strong> judg<strong>in</strong>g the proposed<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational rules of private <strong>in</strong>ternational law.<br />

7.4. How we struggled (part I):<br />

the relationship between the assignor and the<br />

assignee <strong>in</strong> Article 14 paragraph 1 Rome I<br />

As has been determ<strong>in</strong>ed extensively <strong>in</strong> legal literature, the legal concepts<br />

<strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> the substantive laws on assignment of the various Member<br />

States are varied. Aspects that under one law are a matter of property law<br />

are under another law part of the law of obligations.<br />

152<br />

Paulien M. M. van der Gr<strong>in</strong>ten<br />

© sellier. european law publishers<br />

www.sellier.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!