Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C. Developments and Prospects <strong>in</strong> Europe and <strong>in</strong> European <strong>Law</strong> Projects<br />
Member States that did participate <strong>in</strong> the debates on assignment had<br />
various reasons for do<strong>in</strong>g so. Some had an important f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>dustry to<br />
protect and facilitate. This applied, for <strong>in</strong>stance, to the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />
and the Netherlands, whose banks and lawyers were both deeply <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
<strong>in</strong> complex structured f<strong>in</strong>ance products. Their respective governments<br />
thought this f<strong>in</strong>ancial trade deserved protection and support by hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
choice-of-law rule stimulat<strong>in</strong>g rather than complicat<strong>in</strong>g their f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Others happened to have an expert delegate: for example, a legal<br />
scholar who could contribute dogmatic arguments to the debate. F<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />
some Member States wanted to protect their exist<strong>in</strong>g national choiceof-law<br />
rule on third-party effects, or to prevent the application of their<br />
national substantive laws on assignment becom<strong>in</strong>g rarely used if a certa<strong>in</strong><br />
choice-of-law rule were to be adopted.<br />
To determ<strong>in</strong>e the Dutch position <strong>in</strong> the debate, I consulted on a regular<br />
basis <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>gs, by email, and by telephone with f<strong>in</strong>ancial experts<br />
from banks, law firms, and universities to learn the key po<strong>in</strong>ts for the<br />
Netherlands. Dur<strong>in</strong>g negotiations, a delegation can participate <strong>in</strong> the<br />
discussions by mak<strong>in</strong>g written proposals. In the case of Article 14 Rome<br />
I, we cont<strong>in</strong>uously stressed the needs of the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry and legal<br />
practice, giv<strong>in</strong>g examples and demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the practical consequences<br />
of the proposed rules.<br />
However, even with few Member States, Brussels discussions sometimes<br />
are rem<strong>in</strong>iscent of the tower of Babel. It is not so much the language itself<br />
that causes confusion; rather, the completely different national legal concepts<br />
we use <strong>in</strong> substantive law cause us problems <strong>in</strong> judg<strong>in</strong>g the proposed<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational rules of private <strong>in</strong>ternational law.<br />
7.4. How we struggled (part I):<br />
the relationship between the assignor and the<br />
assignee <strong>in</strong> Article 14 paragraph 1 Rome I<br />
As has been determ<strong>in</strong>ed extensively <strong>in</strong> legal literature, the legal concepts<br />
<strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> the substantive laws on assignment of the various Member<br />
States are varied. Aspects that under one law are a matter of property law<br />
are under another law part of the law of obligations.<br />
152<br />
Paulien M. M. van der Gr<strong>in</strong>ten<br />
© sellier. european law publishers<br />
www.sellier.de