17.05.2014 Views

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. General Aspects of <strong>Party</strong> <strong>Autonomy</strong><br />

the receivables are, by their terms, non-assignable. 7 Registrable securities<br />

such as shares may only be transferred by alteration of the share register. 8<br />

If securities such as shares could be transferred by agreement alone, how<br />

could the parties the share imposed duties upon, <strong>in</strong> particular the company,<br />

know to whom they were supposed to perform? The disposition of an<br />

equitable <strong>in</strong>terest, the nature of which we will come to, may be executed<br />

by contract alone, but this must be <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g signed by the person dispos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the same or by his agent. 9 Similarly, the assignment of a trade<br />

mark 10 , copyright, 11 design, 12 or patent 13 must be <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g and signed by<br />

or on behalf of the assignor. Those <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights which are<br />

registrable also need to be so registered <strong>in</strong> order to be fully effective as<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st third parties. 14<br />

Goods are different. The title to goods can, of course, be transferred by<br />

deed or by delivery (e.g. Christmas presents) but their peculiarity lies <strong>in</strong><br />

the fact that the right to goods can be conveyed by a contract <strong>in</strong> any form<br />

without more. One of the phrases English lawyers learn before they can<br />

walk is that ‘property passes when <strong>in</strong>tended to pass’. 15 This magic spell<br />

embodies the rule that title to goods can be conveyed without the need<br />

for any further step or special form to perfect it: the contract alone suffices.<br />

Here, at least, the Germanic separation between contract and conveyance,<br />

Trennungspr<strong>in</strong>zip, is not found at all. The explanation as to why the<br />

law for the transfer of the right to goods should be different from the law<br />

for the transfer of all other rights appears to be historical accident.<br />

7<br />

L<strong>in</strong>den Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85.<br />

8<br />

Technically, where what is “transferred” is a share what the ‘transferee’ acquires<br />

is a new share by way of novation, the ‘transferor’’s old rights be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cancelled. See M. Ooi, Shares and Other Securities <strong>in</strong> the Conflict of <strong>Law</strong>s<br />

(Oxford University Press, 2003). A share is a proportionate right as aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

the company and other shareholders, the rights of all shareholders of the same<br />

class are the same.<br />

9<br />

<strong>Law</strong> of <strong>Property</strong> Act 1925, s 53(1)(c).<br />

10<br />

Trade Marks Act 1994, s 24(3).<br />

11<br />

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 90(3).<br />

12<br />

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 222(3).<br />

13<br />

Patents Act 1977, s 30(6).<br />

14<br />

Patents Act 1977, s 33; Trade Marks Act 1994, s 25.<br />

15<br />

Sale of Goods Act 1979, s 17.<br />

88<br />

Robert Stevens<br />

© sellier. european law publishers<br />

www.sellier.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!