Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A. General Aspects of <strong>Party</strong> <strong>Autonomy</strong><br />
the receivables are, by their terms, non-assignable. 7 Registrable securities<br />
such as shares may only be transferred by alteration of the share register. 8<br />
If securities such as shares could be transferred by agreement alone, how<br />
could the parties the share imposed duties upon, <strong>in</strong> particular the company,<br />
know to whom they were supposed to perform? The disposition of an<br />
equitable <strong>in</strong>terest, the nature of which we will come to, may be executed<br />
by contract alone, but this must be <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g signed by the person dispos<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of the same or by his agent. 9 Similarly, the assignment of a trade<br />
mark 10 , copyright, 11 design, 12 or patent 13 must be <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g and signed by<br />
or on behalf of the assignor. Those <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights which are<br />
registrable also need to be so registered <strong>in</strong> order to be fully effective as<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st third parties. 14<br />
Goods are different. The title to goods can, of course, be transferred by<br />
deed or by delivery (e.g. Christmas presents) but their peculiarity lies <strong>in</strong><br />
the fact that the right to goods can be conveyed by a contract <strong>in</strong> any form<br />
without more. One of the phrases English lawyers learn before they can<br />
walk is that ‘property passes when <strong>in</strong>tended to pass’. 15 This magic spell<br />
embodies the rule that title to goods can be conveyed without the need<br />
for any further step or special form to perfect it: the contract alone suffices.<br />
Here, at least, the Germanic separation between contract and conveyance,<br />
Trennungspr<strong>in</strong>zip, is not found at all. The explanation as to why the<br />
law for the transfer of the right to goods should be different from the law<br />
for the transfer of all other rights appears to be historical accident.<br />
7<br />
L<strong>in</strong>den Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85.<br />
8<br />
Technically, where what is “transferred” is a share what the ‘transferee’ acquires<br />
is a new share by way of novation, the ‘transferor’’s old rights be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cancelled. See M. Ooi, Shares and Other Securities <strong>in</strong> the Conflict of <strong>Law</strong>s<br />
(Oxford University Press, 2003). A share is a proportionate right as aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
the company and other shareholders, the rights of all shareholders of the same<br />
class are the same.<br />
9<br />
<strong>Law</strong> of <strong>Property</strong> Act 1925, s 53(1)(c).<br />
10<br />
Trade Marks Act 1994, s 24(3).<br />
11<br />
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 90(3).<br />
12<br />
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 222(3).<br />
13<br />
Patents Act 1977, s 30(6).<br />
14<br />
Patents Act 1977, s 33; Trade Marks Act 1994, s 25.<br />
15<br />
Sale of Goods Act 1979, s 17.<br />
88<br />
Robert Stevens<br />
© sellier. european law publishers<br />
www.sellier.de