Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12. <strong>Party</strong> <strong>Autonomy</strong> and Insolvency <strong>Law</strong><br />
handed down on the basis of the <strong>in</strong>solvency regulation, is recognized or<br />
declared enforceable <strong>in</strong> Belgium <strong>in</strong> accordance with article 22 (…).<br />
§ 2. A foreign judicial decision as referred to <strong>in</strong> § 1 may not be given<br />
effects <strong>in</strong> Belgium that are contrary to the rights of parties pursuant to<br />
the rules established <strong>in</strong> article 119, § 2-§ 4.’ 22<br />
Consequently, the protection of reliance on the irreversibility of a particular<br />
transaction under the lex causae <strong>in</strong> many cases may extend to transactions<br />
with counterparties <strong>in</strong> any jurisdiction and governed by any law.<br />
This means that the number of legal systems available to parties that<br />
wish to make their transaction safe aga<strong>in</strong>st avoidance <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>solvency is <strong>in</strong><br />
theory unlimited.<br />
12.3. Conclud<strong>in</strong>g observations<br />
Accept<strong>in</strong>g party autonomy <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational property law has consequences<br />
for the protection offered to other creditors under <strong>in</strong>solvency law by avoidance<br />
rules. The po<strong>in</strong>t of departure is that the reversal of pre-<strong>in</strong>solvency<br />
transactions is governed by the lex concursus. However, it is a common<br />
feature of the EC Insolvency Regulation and rules of customary private<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational law <strong>in</strong> a number of jurisdictions that the ‘legitimate’ expectations<br />
that a transaction was valid and not subject to reversal under the<br />
law govern<strong>in</strong>g that transaction are protected. One of the consequences<br />
of allow<strong>in</strong>g party autonomy <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational property law would be that<br />
parties could choose the law that is most favourable to them <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
avoidance of the rights they have acquired. Parties can avoid avoidance<br />
by way of a choice of law. This <strong>in</strong> itself is noth<strong>in</strong>g new, but allow<strong>in</strong>g party<br />
autonomy <strong>in</strong> the field of <strong>in</strong>ternational property law would add to the<br />
choices available for parties to make their transaction safe aga<strong>in</strong>st subsequent<br />
<strong>in</strong>terference by a liquidator <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>solvency proceed<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
This <strong>in</strong> itself, however, should not be considered a decisive argument<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st the possibility of party autonomy <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational property law. In<br />
most cases, the choice for a particular law will be based on a number of factors,<br />
such as the parties’ knowledge of and familiarity with the chosen law,<br />
its useful purpose for the transaction (other than mak<strong>in</strong>g it safe aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
avoidance actions), and so on. It is also not an unknown feature that legal<br />
22<br />
Translation by the author.<br />
P. M. Veder<br />
275<br />
© sellier. european law publishers<br />
www.sellier.de