17.05.2014 Views

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12. <strong>Party</strong> <strong>Autonomy</strong> and Insolvency <strong>Law</strong><br />

handed down on the basis of the <strong>in</strong>solvency regulation, is recognized or<br />

declared enforceable <strong>in</strong> Belgium <strong>in</strong> accordance with article 22 (…).<br />

§ 2. A foreign judicial decision as referred to <strong>in</strong> § 1 may not be given<br />

effects <strong>in</strong> Belgium that are contrary to the rights of parties pursuant to<br />

the rules established <strong>in</strong> article 119, § 2-§ 4.’ 22<br />

Consequently, the protection of reliance on the irreversibility of a particular<br />

transaction under the lex causae <strong>in</strong> many cases may extend to transactions<br />

with counterparties <strong>in</strong> any jurisdiction and governed by any law.<br />

This means that the number of legal systems available to parties that<br />

wish to make their transaction safe aga<strong>in</strong>st avoidance <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>solvency is <strong>in</strong><br />

theory unlimited.<br />

12.3. Conclud<strong>in</strong>g observations<br />

Accept<strong>in</strong>g party autonomy <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational property law has consequences<br />

for the protection offered to other creditors under <strong>in</strong>solvency law by avoidance<br />

rules. The po<strong>in</strong>t of departure is that the reversal of pre-<strong>in</strong>solvency<br />

transactions is governed by the lex concursus. However, it is a common<br />

feature of the EC Insolvency Regulation and rules of customary private<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational law <strong>in</strong> a number of jurisdictions that the ‘legitimate’ expectations<br />

that a transaction was valid and not subject to reversal under the<br />

law govern<strong>in</strong>g that transaction are protected. One of the consequences<br />

of allow<strong>in</strong>g party autonomy <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational property law would be that<br />

parties could choose the law that is most favourable to them <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

avoidance of the rights they have acquired. Parties can avoid avoidance<br />

by way of a choice of law. This <strong>in</strong> itself is noth<strong>in</strong>g new, but allow<strong>in</strong>g party<br />

autonomy <strong>in</strong> the field of <strong>in</strong>ternational property law would add to the<br />

choices available for parties to make their transaction safe aga<strong>in</strong>st subsequent<br />

<strong>in</strong>terference by a liquidator <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>solvency proceed<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

This <strong>in</strong> itself, however, should not be considered a decisive argument<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st the possibility of party autonomy <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational property law. In<br />

most cases, the choice for a particular law will be based on a number of factors,<br />

such as the parties’ knowledge of and familiarity with the chosen law,<br />

its useful purpose for the transaction (other than mak<strong>in</strong>g it safe aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

avoidance actions), and so on. It is also not an unknown feature that legal<br />

22<br />

Translation by the author.<br />

P. M. Veder<br />

275<br />

© sellier. european law publishers<br />

www.sellier.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!