17.05.2014 Views

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

D. Assignment; F<strong>in</strong>ancial Instruments; Insolvency <strong>Law</strong><br />

sor Paul Lagarde, the great authority on conflict of laws, argu<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

a French perspective, has doubted whether one can split the property<br />

aspects <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>ternal ones – those between the parties to the assignment –<br />

and external ones – those towards third parties. 20 But <strong>in</strong> fact, with regard<br />

to assignment of claims, there is a l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> French legal th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g that divides<br />

the problem <strong>in</strong> just that way: namely, the mere consensus of the<br />

assignment parties transferr<strong>in</strong>g the claim between them, and only an additional<br />

step – notification to the debtor or his express assent – mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the assignment effective towards others. 21 In provid<strong>in</strong>g exactly for this<br />

external aspect, Article 27 shows that the European legislator f<strong>in</strong>ds just<br />

such a split not as <strong>in</strong>congruous as it may appear to observers outside of<br />

France. 22<br />

In contrast, Article 27(2) is very clear <strong>in</strong> call<strong>in</strong>g for a report that possibly<br />

proposes a ‘modification’ of the Regulation with regard to the<br />

topic of third-party effects. 23 The text obviously presupposes that the<br />

Regulation does conta<strong>in</strong> a rule on the topic, which, however, should be<br />

reconsidered and, if it appears necessary, be modified; it also seems to<br />

allow Article 14 to rema<strong>in</strong> unaltered if the Commission or the Council<br />

and the Parliament so decide. Thus, all <strong>in</strong> all, the textual <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

ends with a somewhat mixed result. Taken alone, the text of Article<br />

14 neither compels nor excludes its application to third-party effectiveness.<br />

legal orders where such aspects are treated separately from the aspects under<br />

the law of obligations.’<br />

20<br />

Lagarde, Retour sur la loi applicable à l’opposabilité des transferts conventionnels<br />

de créances, <strong>in</strong>: Droit et actualité: Études offertes à Jacques Bégu<strong>in</strong>, Paris<br />

2005, p. 419, 424.<br />

21<br />

The system has recently been expla<strong>in</strong>ed to foreign readers by Verhagen / ​van<br />

Dongen (note 2) 6-7; Bauer (note 5) 64-77.<br />

22<br />

For the latter view, see Flessner (note 6) 40; Verhagen / ​van Dongen (note 2)<br />

5-8.<br />

23<br />

The English version speaks of the envisaged proposal ‘to amend’ the Regulation.<br />

This might evoke the idea of an addition to the exist<strong>in</strong>g text, but all the<br />

other versions <strong>in</strong> Germanic and Romanic languages use the term ‘modification’:<br />

modificación (Sp), modification (Fr), modifica (It), alteracao (Port),<br />

wijzig<strong>in</strong>g (Du), aendr<strong>in</strong>g (Dan), ändr<strong>in</strong>g (Swed), Änderung (Ger).<br />

214<br />

Axel Flessner<br />

© sellier. european law publishers<br />

www.sellier.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!