17.05.2014 Views

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11. F<strong>in</strong>ancial Collateral Arrangements and <strong>Party</strong> <strong>Autonomy</strong><br />

with the collateral as though its absolute owner’. 52 This might be problematic<br />

under Dutch law <strong>in</strong> cases where a security right has been created<br />

(as opposed to transfer arrangements) because a pledgee may generally<br />

only sell the relevant assets and keep the proceeds of the sale up to the<br />

amount of the secured liabilities. However, if the arrangement qualifies<br />

as a f<strong>in</strong>ancial collateral arrangement, the Dutch legislation implement<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the Collateral Directive would enable the secured party to appropriate<br />

the collateral or to set off the secured obligations aga<strong>in</strong>st the value of the<br />

collateral. The most important Dutch law provision that has been disapplied<br />

for this purpose is the prohibition on appropriation 53 of the pledged<br />

securities which would normally apply pursuant to article 3:235 of the<br />

Dutch Civil Code. 54 Consequently, there appear to be no restrictions <strong>in</strong><br />

comparison with the possibilities that the secured party has under English<br />

law <strong>in</strong> this respect. Even <strong>in</strong> terms of enforcement, there would seem to be<br />

party autonomy and very few restrictions <strong>in</strong>deed (if any).<br />

11.3.7. F<strong>in</strong>al remarks<br />

There are three further issues that have not yet been discussed and that<br />

will only be briefly touched upon here. The first is that a choice of jurisdiction<br />

for applicable law should preferably be accompanied by a submission<br />

to the jurisdiction of the relevant courts. An English court apply<strong>in</strong>g English<br />

law is probably preferable to a Dutch court hav<strong>in</strong>g to apply English<br />

law (simply because it will be more difficult for the Dutch court to fully<br />

grasp what English law entails). This generally does not cause any prob-<br />

52<br />

Hudson 2009, § 45-61.<br />

53<br />

The term ‘appropriation’ is used here to <strong>in</strong>dicate that the collateral taker takes<br />

the relevant collateral as his or her own upon enforcement and sets off the<br />

secured obligations aga<strong>in</strong>st the value of the collateral, without be<strong>in</strong>g under<br />

the obligation to sell or otherwise realize the collateral.<br />

54<br />

Nor is there a general right of appropriation under English law. Appropriation<br />

as a new remedy for the secured creditor has been <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> England pursuant<br />

to the Collateral Directive. See Joanna Benjam<strong>in</strong>, ‘F<strong>in</strong>ancial Collateral<br />

Arrangements: Lessons from Cukurova’, Insolvency Intelligence, 2008, 21(5),<br />

pp. 65-72. The article also offers a view on what is required for the appropriation<br />

of f<strong>in</strong>ancial collateral.<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>out M. Wibier<br />

247<br />

© sellier. european law publishers<br />

www.sellier.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!