17.05.2014 Views

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.<br />

<strong>Party</strong> <strong>Autonomy</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

<strong>Property</strong> <strong>Law</strong>: A German Perspective<br />

Jan von He<strong>in</strong> *<br />

5.1. Introduction<br />

An essay on party autonomy <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational property law from a German<br />

perspective could be very short. A German lawyer who is asked whether<br />

black-letter German private <strong>in</strong>ternational law allows parties to choose<br />

the law applicable to rights <strong>in</strong> property would, without hesitation, answer<br />

‘No’. And this answer would be correct. Yet, on closer <strong>in</strong>spection, th<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

are more complicated than they first appear. In recent decades, German<br />

private <strong>in</strong>ternational law has witnessed three stages of codification: In<br />

1986, the orig<strong>in</strong>al version of the German Introductory Act to the Civil<br />

Code (E<strong>in</strong>führungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, commonly abbreviated<br />

as EGBGB), which had been <strong>in</strong> force s<strong>in</strong>ce 1900, 1 underwent a<br />

comprehensive reform. 2 However, this revision for the most part was concerned<br />

with elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g violations of modern notions of gender equality<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational family law and with <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to German law the<br />

Rome convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations of<br />

1980 3 – today replaced by the Rome I Regulation. 4 Although a draft deal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with the law applicable to non-contractual obligations and to rights<br />

<strong>in</strong> property had already been elaborated <strong>in</strong> the Federal M<strong>in</strong>istry of Justice<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1984, 5 those issues were dropped <strong>in</strong> the course of further legislation.<br />

*<br />

Professor of German Civil <strong>Law</strong>, Private <strong>International</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and Comparative<br />

<strong>Law</strong>, University of Trier (Germany).<br />

1<br />

Reichsgesetzblatt 1896, p. 604.<br />

2<br />

Bundesgesetzblatt (BGBl.) 1986 part I p. 1142.<br />

3<br />

Convention on the <strong>Law</strong> Applicable to Contractual Obligations of 19 June<br />

1980 (Consolidated Version), O.J. 1998 C 27 / 34.<br />

4<br />

Regulation (EC) No. 593 / 2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council<br />

of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I),<br />

O.J. 2008 L 177 / 6.<br />

5<br />

Repr<strong>in</strong>ted as an annex <strong>in</strong> Kropholler, <strong>International</strong>es Privatrecht, 1 st ed.<br />

1990.<br />

103<br />

© sellier. european law publishers<br />

www.sellier.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!