17.05.2014 Views

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

Party Autonomy in International Property Law - Peace Palace Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D. Assignment; F<strong>in</strong>ancial Instruments; Insolvency <strong>Law</strong><br />

In conclusion then, parties to a credit default swap that want to enter <strong>in</strong>to<br />

a collateral arrangement would be unlikely to run <strong>in</strong>to too much trouble <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of restrictions to their party autonomy. They can choose English or<br />

New York law to govern their arrangement and standard documentation is<br />

readily available. The contracts can be signed and the collateral can subsequently<br />

be provided <strong>in</strong> accordance with the terms of these contracts.<br />

There is, however, a separate problem <strong>in</strong> this scenario. Is the actual provision<br />

of collateral not a matter of property law rather than contract law,<br />

contrary to what has been assumed up until now <strong>in</strong> this chapter? Should<br />

there not be a proprietary transfer of collateral which is mandatorily governed<br />

by Dutch law? And does this not form a serious restriction of the<br />

parties’ autonomy?<br />

In order to actually post the collateral, the collateral provider (Rock Solid<br />

Bank) will have to transfer an amount of cash to Alpha Bank to cover<br />

the risk of non-payment under the credit default swap. This will take<br />

the form of a bank transfer. There is no property law <strong>in</strong>volved because<br />

bank transfers are a matter of contract law. Rock Solid Bank will simply<br />

<strong>in</strong>struct its bank to transfer an amount of funds to Alpha Bank However,<br />

the word ‘transfer’ is <strong>in</strong> fact mislead<strong>in</strong>g here. An ord<strong>in</strong>ary bank transfer<br />

takes the form of a reduction of the balance held by the ‘transferor’ with<br />

its own bank followed by an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the balance of the ‘transferee’.<br />

For example, if I transfer 100 EUR to my friend Paul, the balance with<br />

my bank will be reduced by EUR 100 and Paul’s balance with his bank<br />

will be <strong>in</strong>creased by the same amount. There is no actual transfer or other<br />

property law aspect <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the entire transaction. 31 The parties (Alpha<br />

Bank and Rock Solid Bank <strong>in</strong> our example) will ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> accounts<br />

with one another <strong>in</strong> which they record the amount of collateral that has<br />

been provided <strong>in</strong> accordance with the credit support annex. 32 The actual<br />

transfers are made <strong>in</strong> accordance with the <strong>in</strong>structions of the transferee<br />

or transferor as applicable by transfer <strong>in</strong>to one or more bank accounts<br />

specified by the recipient. 33<br />

31<br />

See, for English law, Charles Proctor and Roy Goode, Goode on payment obligations<br />

<strong>in</strong> commercial and f<strong>in</strong>ancial transactions, 2 nd edition, Sweet & Maxwell,<br />

London 2009, § 4-20, and Hudson 2009, § 2-10; and for Dutch law, R.J.<br />

Abendroth and R.M. Wibier, ‘Giraal betal<strong>in</strong>gsverkeer en het faillissement van<br />

de reken<strong>in</strong>ghouder’, WPNR 6752, 2008, pp. 324-332.<br />

32<br />

Hudson 2009, § 45-43.<br />

33<br />

ISDA Credit Support Annex, § 3(a).<br />

238<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>out M. Wibier<br />

© sellier. european law publishers<br />

www.sellier.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!