The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Almost immediately after her appo<strong>in</strong>tment, Congress defeated a proposal to give<br />
states the power to run the program. Always an advocate of state action, Mecklenburg<br />
responded to the Congressional defeat by shift<strong>in</strong>g the OAPP’s programs <strong>and</strong> over $175<br />
million <strong>in</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g to, <strong>in</strong> effect, give the states power. She gave one Title X grant per<br />
state health department. Mecklenburg constantly pushed to place the abortion debate<br />
back on a state level throughout her pro-life activist career. She was most familiar with<br />
that type of debate, as the state was where her activism began; even <strong>in</strong> her work <strong>in</strong> NRLC<br />
<strong>and</strong> ACCL, she always wanted open affiliation <strong>and</strong> dialogue between the state <strong>and</strong><br />
national groups. Mecklenburg once aga<strong>in</strong> brought the abortion debate back to the states<br />
when serv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> her government appo<strong>in</strong>tment. Perhaps she was motivated by the<br />
possibility some states would grant money to conservative family plann<strong>in</strong>g organizations<br />
<strong>and</strong> remove funds from more liberal ones (which would not happen if the grants were<br />
made on a national level). Divid<strong>in</strong>g grants among the states, rather than distribut<strong>in</strong>g them<br />
at a national level, gave the pro-life movement hope that at least some victories could be<br />
won. 112 Additionally, for “reasons of efficiency,” Mecklenburg began reassign<strong>in</strong>g<br />
members of the DHHS Wash<strong>in</strong>gton office who were pro-choice. 113 Some had directly<br />
countered her <strong>in</strong> the past. Bill White, for example, a Title X supervisor, had recently<br />
been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a lawsuit aga<strong>in</strong>st Planned Parenthood on accusations of<br />
mismanagement. <strong>Pro</strong>-life activists filed over 500 compla<strong>in</strong>ts aga<strong>in</strong>st the organization <strong>in</strong><br />
112 This plan obta<strong>in</strong>ed the results Marjory <strong>and</strong> pro-life activists hoped for; the state of Utah<br />
transferred $440,000 from Planned Parenthood to its state health department. <strong>The</strong> state health department<br />
required parental permission for m<strong>in</strong>ors to obta<strong>in</strong> birth control; Planned Parenthood did not. Without<br />
need<strong>in</strong>g to draft or pass any national legislation, Marjory had successfully (<strong>and</strong> secondarily) imposed<br />
greater restrictions on family plann<strong>in</strong>g, a result that certa<strong>in</strong>ly pleased pro-life activists.<br />
113 McKeegan, 67.<br />
100