30.05.2014 Views

The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York

The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York

The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3: <strong>The</strong> Post-<strong>Roe</strong> Shift: M<strong>in</strong>nesota Citizens Concerned for <strong>Life</strong><br />

Redirect <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pro</strong>gress at Home, While Founders Move Onward <strong>and</strong><br />

Upward<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> Wave of a Post-<strong>Roe</strong> Debate:<br />

MCCL’s Accomplishments After a “Day of Infamy <strong>in</strong> American<br />

History” 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States Supreme Court h<strong>and</strong>ed down the <strong>Roe</strong> v. Wade <strong>and</strong> Doe v.<br />

Bolton decisions on January 22, 1973, chang<strong>in</strong>g American law <strong>and</strong> the abortion debate<br />

for nearly forty years, <strong>and</strong> count<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> justices who held the majority op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> <strong>Roe</strong> v.<br />

Wade argued the Texas abortion statute that prevented first trimester abortions violated<br />

the Due <strong>Pro</strong>cess Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. 2 Additionally,<br />

the less familiar Doe v. Bolton decision ruled the multiple requirements <strong>in</strong> Georgia’s<br />

abortion statute (that abortions must be conducted <strong>in</strong> hospitals, approved by the hospital’s<br />

board committee, <strong>and</strong> that the woman seek<strong>in</strong>g the abortion must be a citizen of Georgia)<br />

all violated the Due <strong>Pro</strong>cess Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as well. 3 With these<br />

decisions came a great wave of many more to come, <strong>and</strong> with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g frequency.<br />

While the twentieth century Supreme Court heard <strong>and</strong> ruled on only five cases relat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

abortion prior to 1973, it saw three <strong>in</strong> 1973 alone, fourteen more <strong>in</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g years of<br />

1 Marjory Mecklenburg, quoted <strong>in</strong> “Court’s Rul<strong>in</strong>g on Abortion Hit,” UPI, Seattle Post<br />

Intelligencer, A5, 29 April 1974, ACCL Records, Box 27, Folder: ACCL Adm<strong>in</strong> File: M. Mecklenburg<br />

1973-76 (1), Gerald R. Ford <strong>Pre</strong>sidential Library.<br />

2 Palmer, 321.<br />

3 Ibid., 91.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!