The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the 1970s, <strong>and</strong> an additional thirteen <strong>in</strong> the 1980s. 4<br />
<strong>The</strong> January 22, 1973 decisions<br />
caused activists on both sides of the issue to burst with renewed <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
enthusiasm.<br />
Some, like historian Suzanne Staggenborg, argue the anti-abortion movement was<br />
<strong>in</strong> fact spurred to greater action by the decision than were its pro-abortion opponents after<br />
<strong>Roe</strong>. Staggenborg argues that “[a]lthough anti-abortion groups had been active before<br />
1973, the legalization of abortion provided a tremendous spur to the…movement as it<br />
lobbied to overturn or block implementation of the Court rul<strong>in</strong>g…[T]he war was<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g on new fronts.” 5<br />
<strong>The</strong> most prevalent new front for the pro-life campaign was<br />
the national stage, where pro-life groups pressured Congress for amendments outlaw<strong>in</strong>g<br />
abortion. For example, pro-life activists received a 1976 victory <strong>in</strong> the form of the Hyde<br />
Amendment, which elim<strong>in</strong>ated taxpayer fund<strong>in</strong>g for abortions. On the local level, <strong>Roe</strong><br />
boosted pro-life forces like MCCL to pressure state legislatures to publicly oppose the<br />
decision. On an even smaller scale, state groups picketed <strong>and</strong> protested <strong>in</strong> front of<br />
abortion cl<strong>in</strong>ics <strong>and</strong> hospitals to block the implementation of abortions <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
communities. 6<br />
Beyond the borders of M<strong>in</strong>nesota previously discussed, for example, prolife<br />
activist Thomas A. Licciardi delivered a petition of 7,200 names to the Riverside<br />
Hospital <strong>in</strong> Boonton, N.J. after it started allow<strong>in</strong>g abortions <strong>in</strong> alignment with the <strong>Roe</strong><br />
decision. 7<br />
Riverside soon returned to its previous restrictive policy, out of fear of los<strong>in</strong>g<br />
4 Ibid., 370-1.<br />
5 Suzanne Staggenborg, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Pro</strong>-Choice <strong>Movement</strong>: Organization <strong>and</strong> Activism <strong>in</strong> the Abortion<br />
Conflict (<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>: Oxford University <strong>Pre</strong>ss, 1991), 58.<br />
6 “Fraser’s abortion st<strong>and</strong> draws fire <strong>in</strong> St. Joseph,” <strong>The</strong> St. Cloud Daily Times, No. 64, 26<br />
August, 1978, page 1, given to author from personal archives of Mary <strong>and</strong> Robert Joyce.<br />
7 Jeffrey A. Tannenbaum, “A <strong>New</strong> Cause: Many Americans Jo<strong>in</strong> Move to Ban Abortion;<br />
Legislators Take Note,” <strong>The</strong> Wall Street Journal, 2 August 1973, page one, ACCL Records, Box 7, Folder:<br />
NRLC – States <strong>Pro</strong>gram Comm, 1973 (5), Gerald R. Ford Library.<br />
44