The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
she said this was not the “sorest disappo<strong>in</strong>tment.” 75 <strong>Pro</strong>-life advocates focused on<br />
Congressional success <strong>and</strong> also looked toward the 1978 (“just two years away”) <strong>and</strong> 1980<br />
elections for more victories for their cause. 76<br />
By 1979, many publications reported “the national right-to-life movement has<br />
emerged from obscurity to become a potent, controversial force <strong>in</strong> American politics with<br />
an ambitious agenda for 1980 <strong>and</strong> the future.” 77<br />
<strong>Pro</strong>-life activists set a goal of prevent<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the re-election of six senators <strong>and</strong> six congressmen, a threat that once “would have been<br />
dismissed as ludicrous,” yet was taken seriously after an estimated 70,000 activists<br />
marched on the Capitol on the fifth anniversary of the decision on January 22, 1978; their<br />
numbers represented the largest march on Wash<strong>in</strong>gton s<strong>in</strong>ce the Vietnam War. 78<br />
<strong>Pro</strong>-life<br />
activists filled over 3,000 chapters, mobiliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> represent<strong>in</strong>g 11 million voters; they<br />
composed a clear threat for the 1978 <strong>and</strong> 1980 campaigns. 79<br />
Additionally, 1978 saw<br />
many losses for the Democratic Party. In M<strong>in</strong>nesota, for example, the Democratic-<br />
Farmer-Labor Party, which had dom<strong>in</strong>ated the state’s politics for years, lost the<br />
governorship <strong>and</strong> both U.S. Senate seats to Republicans; one DFL executive director<br />
admitted to <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> Times that the pro-life movement is “an extremely effective<br />
political organization.” 80<br />
<strong>Pro</strong>m<strong>in</strong>ent pro-choice activists realized the shift <strong>in</strong> sympathy<br />
for the pro-life movement, admitt<strong>in</strong>g, “[h]ad we made more ga<strong>in</strong>s through the legislative<br />
<strong>and</strong> referendum processes, <strong>and</strong> taken a little longer at it, the public would have moved<br />
75 Ibid.<br />
76 Ibid.<br />
77 “S<strong>in</strong>gle-Issue Politics: <strong>The</strong> Emergence of the Right-To-<strong>Life</strong> <strong>Movement</strong>,” <strong>The</strong> Political Animal,<br />
29 January 1979, Issue No. 283, ACCL Records, Box 35, Folder: ACCL Political File: Political – political<br />
<strong>New</strong>sletters 1979/1980, Gerald R. Ford Library.<br />
78 John Herbers, “Right-to-life movement prepares for 1980 election,” M<strong>in</strong>nesota Star Tribune, 27<br />
November 1978, 1A, ACCL Records, Box 35, Folder: ACCL Political File: Political – Political Strategy,<br />
<strong>and</strong> “S<strong>in</strong>gle-Issue Politics,” <strong>The</strong> Political Animal.<br />
79 Gelb <strong>and</strong> Palley, “Women <strong>and</strong> Interest Group Politics,” 379, quoted <strong>in</strong> Critchlow, 207.<br />
80 Ibid.<br />
63