30.05.2014 Views

The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York

The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York

The Pre-Roe Pro-Life Movement in Minnesota and New York

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecord of be<strong>in</strong>g v<strong>in</strong>dictive.” 90 Carolyn Gerster was an Arizona native, <strong>and</strong> pro-life<br />

activists knew it; they saw Reagan’s response as a great <strong>in</strong>sult <strong>and</strong> “a gratuitous display<br />

of <strong>in</strong>sensitivity,” further susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rough relations between the movement<br />

<strong>and</strong> the president. 91<br />

In Congress, pro-life momentum had largely come to a halt by the end of 1982, at<br />

least with regard to a possible constitutional amendment overturn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Roe</strong> v. Wade.<br />

Senator Jesse Helms <strong>and</strong> Senator Orr<strong>in</strong> Hatch drafted compet<strong>in</strong>g constitutional<br />

amendments at the turn of the decade, <strong>and</strong> debates became <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly futile <strong>in</strong> 1981 <strong>and</strong><br />

1982. <strong>The</strong> amendments were attached to a debt-ceil<strong>in</strong>g bill <strong>and</strong> filibustered <strong>in</strong> the Senate,<br />

further frustrat<strong>in</strong>g legislators on all sides of the issue. <strong>The</strong> prolonged debate caused<br />

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> to shout from his seat, “[w]e have before<br />

us the greatest constitutional crisis s<strong>in</strong>ce the Civil War!” 92 On September 15, 1982,<br />

Hatch withdrew his amendment, <strong>and</strong> the Helms amendment was tabled soon after.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to historian Donald Critchlow, this <strong>in</strong>stance ended the movement for a<br />

constitutional amendment that would overturn the <strong>Roe</strong> v. Wade decision. <strong>Pro</strong>-life<br />

activists soon went away from the <strong>New</strong> Right <strong>and</strong> from the <strong>Pre</strong>sident himself; Reagan’s<br />

<strong>in</strong>action compounded with the failures <strong>and</strong> stalemate <strong>in</strong> Congress, accord<strong>in</strong>g to historian<br />

Connie Paige, left “right-to-life activists…isolated, confused as to where to go from<br />

there.” 93 90 National Right to <strong>Life</strong> <strong>New</strong>s, July 13 <strong>and</strong> 27, Aug. 10 <strong>and</strong> 24 <strong>and</strong> Sept. 28, 1981, quoted <strong>in</strong><br />

Paige, 224.<br />

91 Paige, 224.<br />

92 <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> Times, 19 August 1982, quoted <strong>in</strong> Critchlow, 232.<br />

93 Paige, 222.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!