Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute
Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute
Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>CCOS</strong> Field Operations Plan Version 2: 5/31/00<br />
4.5.3 Sodars<br />
Sodar performance audits depend, to some extent, on the type of sodar being employed.<br />
For most sodars, the audit is conducted by comparing the sodar data with simulated winds from<br />
an Acoustic Pulse Transponder (APT). Unlike conventional sensors where known wind speeds<br />
and directions can be input directly to the sensor through various rotational methods, the acoustic<br />
system relies on the measurement of time and frequency shift of the backscattered acoustic pulse.<br />
The only means of truly providing a known input is through the introduction of fixed audio<br />
frequencies at known times. The frequency shift will correspond to a simulated Doppler shift<br />
introduced by winds to or from an antenna. The timing of the simulated return will represent a<br />
known altitude based on the speed of sound. These simulations of the Doppler shifted signal will<br />
be performed with an (APT). However, if the sodars are of the phased array variety, the audit is<br />
conducted by comparing the sodar data with independent wind measurements. This comparison<br />
verifies that the beam steering is appropriate by assessing the reasonableness of the data. The<br />
collocated data will most likely be collected using an anemometer kite system.<br />
All wind speed data will be evaluated in resultant vectors as well as converted to<br />
components along the sodar antenna axes. This is consistent with the newest EPA guidance and<br />
will help identify component related problems that may be missed by looking at the resultant<br />
data alone.<br />
As a final check of the sodar data, data collected during several days prior to the audit is<br />
reviewed to establish the internal consistency of the values. As this is a qualitative check, there<br />
are no fixed evaluation criteria. The goal is to evaluate the following:<br />
• Data reliability or quality codes for consistency<br />
• Measured vertical intensity values for detection of potential fixed echoes<br />
• Vertical profile of the individual wind components for detection of potential fixed echoes<br />
and consistency<br />
• Vertical profile of the calculated vector winds for internal consistency<br />
• Methods used to create hourly values from sub-hourly intervals<br />
4.5.4 Surface Meteorological Measurements<br />
Performance audit procedures and criteria are those recommended in the U.S. EPA<br />
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume IV (EPA, 1995). The audit<br />
standards used in the audits, audit standard accuracies and precision, as well as the audit criteria,<br />
are detailed in Table 4.5-1.<br />
Wind Speed. The wind speed audit begins with the inspection of the wind speed cups or<br />
propeller(s) to ensure that they are intact. The cups are then removed to produce a zero point.<br />
Next, the R.M. Young selectable speed anemometer drive is connected to the sensor shaft to<br />
simulate wind speeds of approximately 5, 15 and 35 m/s. Actual values depend on the sensor<br />
model and are determined by multiplying the motor speed by a cup or propeller transfer<br />
coefficient supplied by the manufacturer. The data logger responses are compared to the<br />
calculated actual values and the differences compared to the audit criteria.<br />
Chapter 4: QUALITY ASSURANCE 4-16