11.07.2014 Views

Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute

Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute

Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CCOS</strong> Field Operations Plan Version 2: 5/31/00<br />

4.5.3 Sodars<br />

Sodar performance audits depend, to some extent, on the type of sodar being employed.<br />

For most sodars, the audit is conducted by comparing the sodar data with simulated winds from<br />

an Acoustic Pulse Transponder (APT). Unlike conventional sensors where known wind speeds<br />

and directions can be input directly to the sensor through various rotational methods, the acoustic<br />

system relies on the measurement of time and frequency shift of the backscattered acoustic pulse.<br />

The only means of truly providing a known input is through the introduction of fixed audio<br />

frequencies at known times. The frequency shift will correspond to a simulated Doppler shift<br />

introduced by winds to or from an antenna. The timing of the simulated return will represent a<br />

known altitude based on the speed of sound. These simulations of the Doppler shifted signal will<br />

be performed with an (APT). However, if the sodars are of the phased array variety, the audit is<br />

conducted by comparing the sodar data with independent wind measurements. This comparison<br />

verifies that the beam steering is appropriate by assessing the reasonableness of the data. The<br />

collocated data will most likely be collected using an anemometer kite system.<br />

All wind speed data will be evaluated in resultant vectors as well as converted to<br />

components along the sodar antenna axes. This is consistent with the newest EPA guidance and<br />

will help identify component related problems that may be missed by looking at the resultant<br />

data alone.<br />

As a final check of the sodar data, data collected during several days prior to the audit is<br />

reviewed to establish the internal consistency of the values. As this is a qualitative check, there<br />

are no fixed evaluation criteria. The goal is to evaluate the following:<br />

• Data reliability or quality codes for consistency<br />

• Measured vertical intensity values for detection of potential fixed echoes<br />

• Vertical profile of the individual wind components for detection of potential fixed echoes<br />

and consistency<br />

• Vertical profile of the calculated vector winds for internal consistency<br />

• Methods used to create hourly values from sub-hourly intervals<br />

4.5.4 Surface Meteorological Measurements<br />

Performance audit procedures and criteria are those recommended in the U.S. EPA<br />

Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume IV (EPA, 1995). The audit<br />

standards used in the audits, audit standard accuracies and precision, as well as the audit criteria,<br />

are detailed in Table 4.5-1.<br />

Wind Speed. The wind speed audit begins with the inspection of the wind speed cups or<br />

propeller(s) to ensure that they are intact. The cups are then removed to produce a zero point.<br />

Next, the R.M. Young selectable speed anemometer drive is connected to the sensor shaft to<br />

simulate wind speeds of approximately 5, 15 and 35 m/s. Actual values depend on the sensor<br />

model and are determined by multiplying the motor speed by a cup or propeller transfer<br />

coefficient supplied by the manufacturer. The data logger responses are compared to the<br />

calculated actual values and the differences compared to the audit criteria.<br />

Chapter 4: QUALITY ASSURANCE 4-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!