Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute
Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute
Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) - Desert Research Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CCOS</strong> Field Operations Plan Version 2: 5/31/00<br />
aircraft include two Cessna 182 operated by University of <strong>California</strong>, Davis (UCD), and a Cessa<br />
182 and Piper Aztec operated by Sonoma Technology, Inc. (STI). These aircraft will provide<br />
information at the boundaries and will document the vertical gradients, the mixed layer depth,<br />
and nature of elevated pollutant layers throughout the <strong>CCOS</strong> modeling domain. The<br />
concentrations and (in conjunction with upper air wind soundings) the transport of pollutants<br />
across selected vertical planes will be measured to document transport of pollutants and<br />
precursors between offshore and onshore and between air basins.<br />
In addition, the U.S. Department of Energy Gulfstream 159 (G-1) will participate in<br />
<strong>CCOS</strong> during a two-week period from 6/28/00 to 7/12/00 through the Atmospheric Chemistry<br />
Program (ACP). This collaborative effort is headed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory<br />
(PNNL) with contributions from Argonne and Brookhaven National Laboratories. The issues of<br />
interest for the ACP investigation are formation of elevated ozone layers and their impact on<br />
surface concentration, differences in chemical processing between the elevated and mixed layers,<br />
and time-evolution of the chemical partitioning between chemically active and stable species.<br />
Other questions of secondary interest are the effects of local thermally driven circulation on the<br />
introduction of emissions into the mixed layer, chemical processes in up/down valley or slope<br />
flows, and the influence of advection of air into the <strong>Central</strong> Valley on the distribution of<br />
pollutants within the Valley. The G-1 will also characterize the boundary conditions along the<br />
western boundary of the <strong>CCOS</strong> modeling domain.<br />
One additional aircraft (Twin Otter), flown by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA),<br />
will make measurements in power plant plumes. These data will be used to evaluate the plumein-grid<br />
(PiG) parameterizations used in air quality models. The plume study is described in<br />
Addendix D of the <strong>CCOS</strong> Field <strong>Study</strong> Plan (Fujita et al., 1999).<br />
2.6.1 Overview of Flight Plans<br />
Alternate flight plans have been developed for the two UCD and two STI aircraft<br />
corresponding to the type of ozone episode that is forecast for the IOP day. The three types of<br />
ozone episodes are described in Section 3 and are summarized here.<br />
Type 1 - The San Francisco Bay Area (SFBA) has its highest basin-wide ozone values,<br />
though still less in absolute magnitude than San Joaquin Valley. This scenario is characterized by<br />
the weakest sea breeze (lowest west-to-east component through Carquinez Strait), and the lowest<br />
Oakland inversion base heights.<br />
Type 2 - The San Joaquin Valley (SJV) has its highest basin-wide values while the Bay<br />
Area and Sacramento Valley are relatively cleaner. A stronger sea breeze, relatively to Type 1,<br />
keeps the pollutants moving through the Bay Area and the Sacramento Valley, but may increase<br />
transport into the SJV. Mountain Counties have lower ozone levels during this scenario.<br />
Type 3 – Sacramento Valley (SV) has its highest basin-wide ozone values, as does the<br />
Mountain Counties Air Basin. As with Type 2, a stronger sea breeze is present, relative to Type<br />
1, but the daily maximum surface temperatures in Sacramento Valley are significantly higher,<br />
indicating less and/or later intrusion of the sea breeze, allowing more time for photochemistry<br />
before evening transport to the Mountain Counties.<br />
Chapter 2: FIELD MEASUREMENTS 2-46