Lectures on String Theory
Lectures on String Theory
Lectures on String Theory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
– 66 –<br />
representati<strong>on</strong>s of the transversal (and simultaneously little) Lorentz group SO(24)<br />
as follows<br />
(<br />
α−1ᾱ i −1|0〉 j = α −1ᾱ [i −1|0〉<br />
j] + α<br />
} {{ }<br />
−1ᾱ (i j)<br />
−1 − 1 )<br />
24 δij α−1ᾱ k −1<br />
k |0〉 + 1<br />
} {{ } 24 δij α−1ᾱ k −1|0〉<br />
k .<br />
} {{ }<br />
276<br />
299<br />
singlet<br />
The massless excitati<strong>on</strong> of spin two transforming in representati<strong>on</strong> 299 of SO(24)<br />
was proposed to be identified with a gravit<strong>on</strong>, the quantum of the gravitati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
interacti<strong>on</strong>. To make this identificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e has to relate the string scale α ′ with the<br />
Planck scale G = M −2<br />
P<br />
, where G is the Newt<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stant and M P is the Planck mass:<br />
α ′ = M −2<br />
P .<br />
Since the masses of the massive string modes are proporti<strong>on</strong>al to 1/α ′ = MP 2, these<br />
string excitati<strong>on</strong>s are extremely heavy due to the large value of MP 2 and, by this<br />
reas<strong>on</strong>, they do not show up at the energy scales of the Standard Model.<br />
As in the opens string case the higher massive states of closed string are combined<br />
at a given mass level into representati<strong>on</strong>s of the little Lorentz group SO(25). The<br />
relati<strong>on</strong> between maximal spin and the mass is now<br />
4.3 BRST quantizati<strong>on</strong><br />
J max = α′<br />
2 M 2 + 2 .<br />
The path integral approach proved to be a very useful tool for quantizing the theories<br />
with local (gauge) symmetries. The starting point is the Polyakov acti<strong>on</strong> and a new<br />
BRST (Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin) symmetry. We know that the induced metric<br />
Γ αβ = ∂ α X µ ∂ β X µ and the intrinsic metric h αβ are related classically through the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> T αβ = 0. However, quantum-mechanically this is not the case.<br />
The basic idea is to define the path integral using the Polykov acti<strong>on</strong> and integrate<br />
over<br />
h αβ , X µ<br />
being c<strong>on</strong>sidered as independent variables:<br />
∫<br />
Z = Dh αβ (σ, τ)DX µ (σ, τ)e iSp[X,h]<br />
Due to the gauge invariance the last integral is ill-defined. This occurs because we<br />
integrate infinitely many times over physically equivalent, i.e. related to each other<br />
by gauge transformati<strong>on</strong>s, c<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong>s. This can be understood looking at a much<br />
simpler example of the two-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al integral<br />
Z =<br />
∫ +∞ ∫ +∞<br />
−∞<br />
−∞<br />
dxdy e −(x−y)2 .