27.07.2014 Views

Lectures on String Theory

Lectures on String Theory

Lectures on String Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– 75 –<br />

Thus, Q|χ〉 = 0 is equivalent to the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> that K i |χ〉 = 0, i.e. it is invariant under<br />

the acti<strong>on</strong> of the Lie algebra. On the other hand, this state cannot be represented as<br />

|χ〉 = Q|λ〉 for some |λ〉 because the ghost number of |λ〉 should be equal −1 which<br />

is impossible.<br />

Let us apply this general c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> to the string case. The Lie algebra in this<br />

case is the Virasoro algebra and we supply it with the ghosts c m and ant-ghosts b m .<br />

The BRST operator is now<br />

Q =<br />

+∞∑<br />

−∞<br />

L X −mc m − 1 2<br />

∞∑<br />

(m − n) : c −m c −n b m+n : −ac 0 ,<br />

−∞<br />

where a is the normal-ordering ambiguity c<strong>on</strong>stant for L 0 . It turns out that this<br />

expressi<strong>on</strong> can be written as<br />

Q =<br />

+∞∑<br />

−∞<br />

:<br />

(<br />

L X −m + 1 2 Lgh −m − aδ m,0<br />

)c m :<br />

The ghost-number operator is<br />

U =<br />

+∞∑<br />

−∞<br />

: c −m b m :<br />

We would like to investigate the fulfilment of the relati<strong>on</strong> Q 2 = 0 in quantum theory.<br />

We find<br />

Q 2 = 1 +∞<br />

{Q, Q} =<br />

2<br />

∑<br />

n,m=−∞<br />

([L m , L n ] − (m − n)L m+n<br />

)<br />

c −m c −n .<br />

Here L m = L X m + L gh<br />

m − aδ m,0 is a total Virasoro operator. Thus, Q 2 = 0 for d = 26<br />

and a = 1 as the c<strong>on</strong>sequence of vanishing of the total central charge!<br />

Inverse statement is also true: from Q 2 = 0 it follows that the central charge of<br />

the Virasoro algebra vanishes. Indeed, we first note that<br />

From here<br />

L m = {Q, b m }<br />

[L m , Q] = [{Q, b m }, Q] = (Qb m + b m Q)Q − Q(Qb m + b m Q) = [b m , Q 2 ] = 0<br />

as Q 2 = 0. Therefore, we see that<br />

[L m , L n ] = [L m , {Q, b n }] = {[L m , Q], b n }<br />

} {{ }<br />

=0<br />

+ {Q, [L m , b n ]} = (m − n){Q, b m+n } = (m − n)b m+n .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!