27.07.2014 Views

Lectures on String Theory

Lectures on String Theory

Lectures on String Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– 98 –<br />

The “flat” and “curved” indices of the vector are related as V a = e a αV α . This way of<br />

transforming “flat” to “curved” indices should be valid for any tensor, in particular,<br />

<strong>on</strong>e has to have<br />

D α V a = e a βD α V β .<br />

This is possible <strong>on</strong>ly if<br />

D α e a β = ∂ α e a β − Γ λ αβe a λ + ω a α be b β = 0 .<br />

This equati<strong>on</strong> can be solved for ω α expressing it through the vielbein:<br />

ω ab<br />

α = 1 2 eβa (∂ α e b β − ∂ β e b α) − 1 2 eβb (∂ α e a β − ∂ β e a α) − 1 2 eλa e γb (∂ λ e γc − ∂ γ e λc )e c α .<br />

Since the c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> is completely expressed via the dynamical vielbein and, by this<br />

means, is not an independent field, it is called sometimes composite.<br />

Spin manifolds<br />

On which manifolds <strong>on</strong>e can introduce spinors? This is rather n<strong>on</strong>-trivial questi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Vielbein can always be introduces locally in a coordinate patch U α . It is quite<br />

rare that the vielbein can be also globally defined. In the latter case such manifolds<br />

are called parallelizable. Examples of parallelizable manifolds are Lie groups. On the<br />

other hand, two-sphere is not parallelizable because there is no globally defined vector<br />

field (not talking about the vielbein) which vanishes nowhere. Thus, the vielbein<br />

is defined locally and in the intersecti<strong>on</strong> of the coordinate patches U α ∩ U β <strong>on</strong>e has<br />

e (α) (x) = Λ (αβ) (x)e (β) (x) .<br />

Here Λ (αβ) (x) is the local Lorentz transformati<strong>on</strong> (i.e. a matrix from SO(d − 1, 1))<br />

which is called the transiti<strong>on</strong> functi<strong>on</strong>. In the regi<strong>on</strong> of triple intersecti<strong>on</strong> U α ∩ U β ∩<br />

U γ = U αβγ the transiti<strong>on</strong> functi<strong>on</strong>s should satisfy the following c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong><br />

Λ (αβ) Λ (βγ) Λ (γα) = 1 .<br />

Now if we introduce locally a spinor field ψ (α) then passing from <strong>on</strong>e coordinate patch<br />

to another <strong>on</strong>e the field must transform according to<br />

ψ (α) (x) = ¯Λ (αβ) ψ (β) (x) .<br />

Here ¯Λ (αβ) is the SO(d − 1, 1) matrix in the spinor representati<strong>on</strong>. For spinorial<br />

transiti<strong>on</strong> functi<strong>on</strong>s ¯Λ it also makes sense to require that in the triple intersecti<strong>on</strong><br />

regi<strong>on</strong> the following relati<strong>on</strong> is satisfied<br />

¯Λ (αβ) ¯Λ(βγ) ¯Λ(γα) = ±1 . (6.2)<br />

However, since the spinor representati<strong>on</strong> is double-valued, instead of ¯Λ <strong>on</strong>e can<br />

equally use −¯Λ. Thus, to define spinors <strong>on</strong> a n<strong>on</strong>-parallelizable manifold <strong>on</strong>e has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!