íëìë³´ë2012문íì ë°ì ë¼ì´ëí ì´ë¸.pdf - ì ë¤ì¤ì½íêµììí
íëìë³´ë2012문íì ë°ì ë¼ì´ëí ì´ë¸.pdf - ì ë¤ì¤ì½íêµììí
íëìë³´ë2012문íì ë°ì ë¼ì´ëí ì´ë¸.pdf - ì ë¤ì¤ì½íêµììí
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
enough to carry out development projects without prior knowledge infrastructure on the<br />
recipient regions. That is, alignment is crucial for development projects led by new donors,<br />
and their expertise in the regions needs to be highlighted.<br />
IV. Conclusion: A Strategy to Build Global Cultural Governance in the Post-MDG Era<br />
It is possible to ensure effective development through cultural aid and to create a network<br />
of correlation between culture and development. This can be done via theoretical definition<br />
and case studies regarding the domains of economic value (i.e. culture as a tool for<br />
development) and cultural value (i.e. culture as a cross-cutting issue). Thus, further research<br />
in relevant theories and examples is strongly recommended.<br />
This may also be the basis for formulating strategies in building a global cultural<br />
governance system. To benchmark environmental governance for this purpose, the following<br />
methods may be taken into account: (a) the publication of reports to spread the discourse<br />
(“Our Common Future”); (b) the launch of a new international organization dedicated to the<br />
global system of culture and development (“UNFCCC”) or a fundamental reform of<br />
UNESCO; (c) the leadership of globally renowned figures who can serve as cultural icons<br />
(e.g. Al Gore or Gro Harlem Brundtland); and (d) the collaboration among relevant agencies<br />
to make sure that the discourse of culture and development is incorporated with great<br />
significance into the Post-MDG Global Partnership, an ongoing forum for post-MDG<br />
discussions.