20.10.2014 Views

한눈에보는2012문화와 발전라운드테이블.pdf - 유네스코한국위원회

한눈에보는2012문화와 발전라운드테이블.pdf - 유네스코한국위원회

한눈에보는2012문화와 발전라운드테이블.pdf - 유네스코한국위원회

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

There was also a question about the export and import of cultural expressions. We did<br />

publish an analysis of trade in cultural products and services few years ago. There are several<br />

expressions of cultural goods that do cross borders. So that is indeed possible. You can also<br />

think about the development in the sense of tourism. For instance, in Bhutan, tourism is the<br />

second largest export market. Tourism is basically grounded on their cultural expressions,<br />

their festivals, their religion symbols and others. There are several ways to export cultural<br />

products and sometimes consumers comes to your country … but anyway some kind of<br />

crossing borders is there.<br />

As for answer to why Korea is indicated as no training area in the map in my presentation,<br />

well, it is not that because we pick on Korea or don’t want to come here but somehow we<br />

have not been invited or there was no interest or whatever…<br />

Lynne Patchett<br />

Chief of Staff, UNESCO Culture Sector<br />

The first question picked up on the potential tension between emphasis on economic<br />

progress/development and culture, perhaps the incompatibility between the two. We cannot<br />

ignore that there is an economic side of culture but that is not the only one. We are looking at<br />

development at a broader sense. Our definition of culture set out in the 2001 UNESCO<br />

declaration of cultural diversity defines culture in a very broad sense. It’s something related<br />

to the heart of human identity, and as a means of enriching human existence, building social<br />

cohesion, respects, and promoting these values. That is the heart of various cultural<br />

conventions. We can’t ignore the economic part, and sometimes this is the aspect of the UN’s<br />

focus, but we have to keep the broad approach. For instance, UNESCO promotes this idea in<br />

initiatives such as ‘Dream Centers’, where young people in post-disaster/post-conflict<br />

countries are exposed to arts and express themselves (their emotions) through arts … I want<br />

to reassure that UNESCO promotes this broader definition of culture.<br />

Regarding the issue on culture and human rights, the 2001 declaration mentions very<br />

clearly that all cultures have something to contribute as long as it is compatible with universal<br />

values that UN advocates. UNESCO works at international level with other governments to<br />

promote human rights and to change attitudes. We also try to work at community levels,<br />

trying to develop alternatives, but I acknowledge that this is a very sensitive issue. We are not<br />

a funding agency per se, but we work with donor countries to provide financial and technical<br />

assistance.<br />

Considering the platform for cultural exchange, I think the UN is the platform, where

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!