26.10.2014 Views

Untitled - the ultimate blog

Untitled - the ultimate blog

Untitled - the ultimate blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac<br />

The toxic trio<br />

Aug 13th 2009<br />

From The Economist print edition<br />

American taxpayers are ploughing billions in. Will <strong>the</strong>y get <strong>the</strong>ir money back?<br />

Illustration by S. Kambayashi<br />

FORGET <strong>the</strong> banks and <strong>the</strong> carmakers. The biggest bets that American taxpayers have made are on three<br />

less famous firms: American International Group (AIG), an insurer, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two<br />

mortgage-finance agencies. The state now owns about $170 billion of shares in banks. It has so far<br />

invested over $160 billion of equity in <strong>the</strong> toxic trio, and this number is likely to rise towards $300 billion.<br />

Include o<strong>the</strong>r kinds of help, such as loans, and <strong>the</strong> total pumped into <strong>the</strong> three firms could eventually<br />

reach $800 billion (see table), or 6% of GDP. “I had no idea what I was in for,” admitted Edward Liddy<br />

this month as he stepped down after a gruelling year running AIG. Americans must feel <strong>the</strong> same way.<br />

The case that was made to taxpayers last year for bailing out <strong>the</strong><br />

three is intact. Through its derivatives activities and giant<br />

insurance business, AIG was so entangled in <strong>the</strong> financial system<br />

that it could have brought it down. Fannie and Freddie, which own,<br />

guarantee and help securitise about half of American mortgages,<br />

were judged as vital to a healthy housing market. Banks and<br />

foreign governments held buckets of <strong>the</strong>ir paper, too, in <strong>the</strong> belief<br />

it had implicit state backing. Defaults would have badly hurt<br />

relations with China, <strong>the</strong> largest foreign-government creditor.<br />

What has changed is <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> bill. AIG’s bail-out has been<br />

revised upward four times as its losses have mounted. “They tried<br />

to put on a band aid and <strong>the</strong>n realised <strong>the</strong>y needed a tourniquet,”<br />

says Rob Haines of CreditSights, a rating firm. When <strong>the</strong><br />

government first began to help <strong>the</strong> two mortgage agencies in July<br />

2008, it said capital injections were “not something we expect”.<br />

That looks like a bad joke now. The question is no longer whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> trio will receive vast sums, but whe<strong>the</strong>r taxpayers will get any<br />

money back.<br />

-106-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!