Untitled - the ultimate blog
Untitled - the ultimate blog
Untitled - the ultimate blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac<br />
The toxic trio<br />
Aug 13th 2009<br />
From The Economist print edition<br />
American taxpayers are ploughing billions in. Will <strong>the</strong>y get <strong>the</strong>ir money back?<br />
Illustration by S. Kambayashi<br />
FORGET <strong>the</strong> banks and <strong>the</strong> carmakers. The biggest bets that American taxpayers have made are on three<br />
less famous firms: American International Group (AIG), an insurer, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two<br />
mortgage-finance agencies. The state now owns about $170 billion of shares in banks. It has so far<br />
invested over $160 billion of equity in <strong>the</strong> toxic trio, and this number is likely to rise towards $300 billion.<br />
Include o<strong>the</strong>r kinds of help, such as loans, and <strong>the</strong> total pumped into <strong>the</strong> three firms could eventually<br />
reach $800 billion (see table), or 6% of GDP. “I had no idea what I was in for,” admitted Edward Liddy<br />
this month as he stepped down after a gruelling year running AIG. Americans must feel <strong>the</strong> same way.<br />
The case that was made to taxpayers last year for bailing out <strong>the</strong><br />
three is intact. Through its derivatives activities and giant<br />
insurance business, AIG was so entangled in <strong>the</strong> financial system<br />
that it could have brought it down. Fannie and Freddie, which own,<br />
guarantee and help securitise about half of American mortgages,<br />
were judged as vital to a healthy housing market. Banks and<br />
foreign governments held buckets of <strong>the</strong>ir paper, too, in <strong>the</strong> belief<br />
it had implicit state backing. Defaults would have badly hurt<br />
relations with China, <strong>the</strong> largest foreign-government creditor.<br />
What has changed is <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> bill. AIG’s bail-out has been<br />
revised upward four times as its losses have mounted. “They tried<br />
to put on a band aid and <strong>the</strong>n realised <strong>the</strong>y needed a tourniquet,”<br />
says Rob Haines of CreditSights, a rating firm. When <strong>the</strong><br />
government first began to help <strong>the</strong> two mortgage agencies in July<br />
2008, it said capital injections were “not something we expect”.<br />
That looks like a bad joke now. The question is no longer whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />
<strong>the</strong> trio will receive vast sums, but whe<strong>the</strong>r taxpayers will get any<br />
money back.<br />
-106-