Untitled - the ultimate blog
Untitled - the ultimate blog
Untitled - the ultimate blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Brazil's foreign policy<br />
Lula and his squabbling friends<br />
Aug 13th 2009 | BRASÍLIA<br />
From The Economist print edition<br />
A bold Brazilian attempt to integrate South America has run into difficulty. Critics at home say<br />
Brazil should put national interest over leftist ideology<br />
Illustration by David Simonds<br />
WHEN <strong>the</strong> leaders of <strong>the</strong> Union of South American Nations (UNASUL in Portuguese), a 12-country group<br />
inspired by Brazil, met in Ecuador’s capital, Quito, on August 10th, <strong>the</strong>re was little spirit of union. Their<br />
meeting followed a row between Venezuela and Colombia, whose president, Álvaro Uribe, did not attend,<br />
in part because Ecuador broke off diplomatic relations with his country last year.<br />
Hugo Chávez, Venezuela’s president, backed by his allies, Bolivia and Ecuador, wanted to condemn<br />
Colombia for granting facilities at seven military bases to <strong>the</strong> United States, which is helping it battle<br />
guerrillas and drug-traffickers. “Winds of war are blowing,” he thundered. Four countries, including Chile<br />
and Peru, backed Colombia. Brazil’s president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, tried to damp down <strong>the</strong> dispute,<br />
suggesting that <strong>the</strong> group meet both Barack Obama and Mr Uribe to seek reassurances about <strong>the</strong> use of<br />
<strong>the</strong> bases. But <strong>the</strong>n Mr Chávez launched a diatribe against Colombia and Mr Obama. Lula cut short his<br />
visit to Ecuador and headed home, giving warning that UNASUL could “cease to be an integration process,<br />
becoming just a group of friends.” If only.<br />
This fiasco provides fuel for both sides in a long-running debate in Brazil about <strong>the</strong> foreign policy of <strong>the</strong><br />
Lula government. The critics, who include several senior former diplomats, accuse <strong>the</strong> government of<br />
placing ideology above Brazil’s national interest—especially in policy towards South America.<br />
Lula’s predecessor, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, sought to boost trade and o<strong>the</strong>r ties with <strong>the</strong> United<br />
States and Europe. On taking office in 2003, Lula placed new stress on south-south ties. Brazil has<br />
doubled <strong>the</strong> number of its embassies in Africa, to 30, and joined or set up a clutch of new clubs. These<br />
include IBSA, with India and South Africa, of which Itamaraty, <strong>the</strong> foreign ministry, is especially proud.<br />
As evidence that this policy has borne fruit, Celso Amorim, <strong>the</strong> foreign minister, points out that most of<br />
Brazil’s trade is now with developing countries, thus anticipating Mr Obama’s advice that <strong>the</strong> world should<br />
not rely on <strong>the</strong> United States as consumer of last resort. He concedes that Brazil does not agree with <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r big emerging powers on everything, but <strong>the</strong>y do share an interest in trying to change <strong>the</strong> way that<br />
-36-