26.10.2014 Views

Untitled - the ultimate blog

Untitled - the ultimate blog

Untitled - the ultimate blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At a review conference next year, some will press for this charge to be added to <strong>the</strong> court’s detailed sheet<br />

of punishable crimes. That would be premature. Informal discussions among <strong>the</strong> signatories to <strong>the</strong> court<br />

and some interested outsiders have produced tentative agreement on a definition of aggression. China<br />

and Russia have joined <strong>the</strong> talks, though <strong>the</strong>y are not signatories. The United States, ano<strong>the</strong>r non-signer,<br />

has held aloof, though <strong>the</strong> Obama administration could yet decide to take part. Trickiest of all, however,<br />

will be to figure out a way for <strong>the</strong> court to finger an alleged culprit without treading on <strong>the</strong> prerogatives of<br />

<strong>the</strong> UN Security Council, which is supposed to decide on all matters of war and peace.<br />

Eventually a mechanism may be agreed that involves <strong>the</strong> council. America, China and Russia are unlikely<br />

to join <strong>the</strong> court until that happens and even <strong>the</strong>n may not. The Geneva conventions are taking a<br />

battering, and <strong>the</strong> victims of war are still getting short shrift. But count on <strong>the</strong> big powers to hold <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

own ground.<br />

Copyright © 2009 The Economist Newspaper and The Economist Group. All rights reserved.<br />

-87-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!