Untitled - the ultimate blog
Untitled - the ultimate blog
Untitled - the ultimate blog
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
At a review conference next year, some will press for this charge to be added to <strong>the</strong> court’s detailed sheet<br />
of punishable crimes. That would be premature. Informal discussions among <strong>the</strong> signatories to <strong>the</strong> court<br />
and some interested outsiders have produced tentative agreement on a definition of aggression. China<br />
and Russia have joined <strong>the</strong> talks, though <strong>the</strong>y are not signatories. The United States, ano<strong>the</strong>r non-signer,<br />
has held aloof, though <strong>the</strong> Obama administration could yet decide to take part. Trickiest of all, however,<br />
will be to figure out a way for <strong>the</strong> court to finger an alleged culprit without treading on <strong>the</strong> prerogatives of<br />
<strong>the</strong> UN Security Council, which is supposed to decide on all matters of war and peace.<br />
Eventually a mechanism may be agreed that involves <strong>the</strong> council. America, China and Russia are unlikely<br />
to join <strong>the</strong> court until that happens and even <strong>the</strong>n may not. The Geneva conventions are taking a<br />
battering, and <strong>the</strong> victims of war are still getting short shrift. But count on <strong>the</strong> big powers to hold <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
own ground.<br />
Copyright © 2009 The Economist Newspaper and The Economist Group. All rights reserved.<br />
-87-