Untitled - the ultimate blog
Untitled - the ultimate blog
Untitled - the ultimate blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A history of classical music finally reaches paperback<br />
A feast for musicians, students and casual concert-goers<br />
Aug 13th 2009<br />
From The Economist print edition<br />
Oxford History of Western Music (five volumes). By Richard<br />
Taruskin. Oxford University Press; 3,856 pages; $185 and £90. Buy<br />
from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk<br />
AKG<br />
“THE feeble beginnings of whatever afterwards becomes great or<br />
eminent are interesting to mankind.” So wrote Charles Burney in<br />
1776, opening his history of music with a subtle apologia for <strong>the</strong><br />
historian’s method. Before Burney, treatises on music had been<br />
<strong>the</strong>oretical, intended for practical use or to elaborate <strong>the</strong> eternal laws<br />
of musical science. The new historical approach brought with it <strong>the</strong><br />
advantage of a more nuanced conception of <strong>the</strong> art, better suited to<br />
a wider public. But as in o<strong>the</strong>r areas of 18th-century learning, history<br />
introduced an element of doubt: had <strong>the</strong>re really been progress from<br />
ancient to modern times? Might today’s music not be worse than it<br />
used to be?<br />
That <strong>the</strong> ancients eventually won <strong>the</strong> argument may be gleaned from<br />
<strong>the</strong> fact that we live in an artistic age almost completely dominated<br />
by <strong>the</strong> dead. The modern historian’s task is all <strong>the</strong> more delicate. It<br />
is also lengthier, as is clear from a comparison of Burney’s history Different, but not better or worse<br />
with its contemporary equivalent, Richard Taruskin’s five-volume<br />
work. Since its initial publication at <strong>the</strong> end of 2004, Mr Taruskin’s five-volume survey of 1,200 years of<br />
musical tradition has come in for many criticisms—selectivity, subjectivity, riding roughshod over<br />
contemporary intellectual orthodoxy—but prolixity and over-comprehensiveness have not been among<br />
<strong>the</strong>m.<br />
If <strong>the</strong> original publication of Mr Taruskin’s history sent shock waves through <strong>the</strong> academic musical world,<br />
<strong>the</strong> present reissue of <strong>the</strong> set in paperback is, if anything, a more momentous event. For <strong>the</strong> work,<br />
marvellously awash with judicious reflection on <strong>the</strong> latest scholarship though it is, is not really aimed at<br />
professional scholars. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, its greatest value comes in bringing <strong>the</strong> fruits of advanced scholarship to a<br />
general readership through a compelling, easy-to-read narrative.<br />
But <strong>the</strong> original price of <strong>the</strong> set ($750 or £350), toge<strong>the</strong>r with an internal arrangement that made <strong>the</strong><br />
acquisition of individual volumes impractical, put Mr Taruskin’s efforts beyond <strong>the</strong> reach of those who<br />
might benefit from it <strong>the</strong> most. The new edition is not only much cheaper but its individual volumes are<br />
packaged in a way that allows <strong>the</strong>m to be bought separately.<br />
The book excels for three main reasons. First, as <strong>the</strong> author is keen to point out, this is genuine history.<br />
We are presented not with a miraculous chain of great composers producing timeless masterpieces from<br />
nowhere. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, musical works and stylistic movements are presented in context so that, for example,<br />
<strong>the</strong> origins of <strong>the</strong> dynamic, dramatic style of Mozart and Haydn are shown to lie in Italian opera buffa<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r than in <strong>the</strong> architecturally static idiom of Bach and Handel.<br />
Second, and despite <strong>the</strong> sense of flying through <strong>the</strong> terrain at breakneck speed, <strong>the</strong> level of detail remains<br />
high, with extended commentaries on individual works that show how <strong>the</strong>y were originally conceived and<br />
understood. Third, and despite protestations to <strong>the</strong> contrary in his preface, Mr Taruskin’s subjective<br />
preferences make <strong>the</strong>mselves felt throughout <strong>the</strong> weighty five volumes.<br />
That may sound like damning criticism. In fact, <strong>the</strong> author’s numerous bee-infested bonnets are a delight,<br />
as is <strong>the</strong> way his enthusiasms inform, for example, an extended discussion of Debussy or <strong>the</strong> radically<br />
Russophile conception of early 20th-century works. After all, however objective we may aim to be in<br />
historical discussion of <strong>the</strong> arts, <strong>the</strong> truth is that we are interested in art because we like it.<br />
-134-