28.10.2014 Views

Assessment, Conservation and Sustainable Use of Forest Biodiversity

Assessment, Conservation and Sustainable Use of Forest Biodiversity

Assessment, Conservation and Sustainable Use of Forest Biodiversity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>and</strong> Monitoring<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> the Canadian <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystem Classification<br />

The Canadian <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystem Classification will employ definitions <strong>and</strong> conventions that are consistent with<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the International Classification <strong>of</strong> Ecological Communities. Based on this compatibility, C-FEC<br />

community types will be synonymous with C-NVC forest <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong> associations <strong>and</strong> alliances, effectively<br />

constituting the forest <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong> component <strong>of</strong> the C-NVC. The ICEC system has been endorsed by the<br />

United States federal government as a national st<strong>and</strong>ard for vegetation classification, the US National<br />

Vegetation Classification (US-NVC). The C-FEC types will be able to be compared to existing US forest <strong>and</strong><br />

woodl<strong>and</strong> associations / alliances that either approach or extend across the international border.<br />

At present, existing provincial / territorial forest ecosystem classifications (FEC’s) identify <strong>and</strong> describe over<br />

4000 forest <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong> community types across Canada, but because provincial/territorial FEC st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

are only consistent within their jurisdictional boundaries, it is not possible to directly compare FEC<br />

community types across provincial/territorial borders. A Canadian <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystem Classification will be<br />

constructed by correlating these systems into a common system, using ICEC st<strong>and</strong>ards. Inter-jurisdictional<br />

correlations <strong>and</strong> review <strong>of</strong> the resultant C-FEC types will be achieved using provincial/territorial FEC data <strong>and</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional ecological expertise. ICEC data, together with ecological expertise from ABI-Canada & US <strong>and</strong><br />

regional CDC’s, will be applied to the international correlation <strong>of</strong> resultant C-FEC types with US forest <strong>and</strong><br />

woodl<strong>and</strong> associations/alliances. Thus, C-FEC types will relate to existing provincial / territorial FEC units, as<br />

well as to known US-NVC associations <strong>and</strong> alliances. Data-based linkages to spatial (mapped) reporting<br />

structures such as the National <strong>Forest</strong> Inventory (NFI) or satellite-derived l<strong>and</strong>cover schemes will provide the<br />

ability to attribute additional, ground-level ecological information to remotely derived map polygons <strong>and</strong><br />

legend classes.<br />

The Canadian <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystem Classification will include: 1) a list <strong>of</strong> nationally st<strong>and</strong>ardized, community-level<br />

forest ecosystems that are defined <strong>and</strong> described in terms <strong>of</strong> vegetation characteristics in relation to climate,<br />

site, <strong>and</strong> process factors <strong>and</strong> will be equivalent to associations <strong>of</strong> the US- <strong>and</strong> Canadian National Vegetation<br />

Classifications (both components <strong>of</strong> the ICEC); 2) a classification database containing summaries <strong>of</strong><br />

ecological attributes for the C-FEC units, as well as for their first-order aggregates (alliances), including<br />

information on community species characteristics, habitat <strong>and</strong> biogeographic attributes, <strong>and</strong> ecological<br />

process (e.g., successional) relationships; 3) linkages with nationally <strong>and</strong> regionally mapped ecological<br />

entities, such as the National <strong>Forest</strong> Inventory, the National Ecological Framework, <strong>and</strong> other reporting,<br />

conservation, <strong>and</strong> forest management planning structures.<br />

Partners<br />

This project will be realized as a result <strong>of</strong> collaboration between the following organizations:<br />

Alberta Community Development; Alberta Environment; Association for <strong>Biodiversity</strong> - Canada (soon to be<br />

renamed NatureServe - Canada); Association for <strong>Biodiversity</strong> - US (soon to be renamed NatureServe);<br />

Atlantic Canada <strong>Conservation</strong> Data Centre; British Columbia Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>s; Department <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Affairs <strong>and</strong> Northern Development -Yukon; Manitoba <strong>Conservation</strong>; Ministère des ressources naturelles du<br />

Québec; Natural Resources Canada-Canadian <strong>Forest</strong> Service; New Brunswick Department <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />

Resources <strong>and</strong> Energy; Newfoundl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Labrador Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> Resources <strong>and</strong> Agri-foods; Nova<br />

Scotia Department <strong>of</strong> Environment <strong>and</strong> Labour; Nova Scotia Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources; Ontario<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources; Parks Canada; Prince Edward Isl<strong>and</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture <strong>and</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>ry;<br />

Saskatchewan Environment <strong>and</strong> Resource Management; Yukon Renewable Resources.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!