Biodiversity (1 - SRK Consulting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Vegetation Deficient plant -5 Medium M6 restoration communities Facility conversion Substrate damage -5 Medium M1 * Positive (+) or Negative (-) in the absence of mitigation. Severity score: 0-10, where 0 = no discernible impact and 10 = extremely severe impact extending well beyond the immediate area of the proposed development. * Probability (low, medium, high) of a negative impact occurring. The following Impact Tables are in accordance with the methodology proposed by <strong>SRK</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> See Appendix 1). The Mitigation and environmental management are given in Chapter 12. 134
Impact Table1a: Impact on biodiversity of the SATO-SLC PV array on the farm Zuurwater near Aggeneys during the Construction Phase - Without mitigation Impact by Likelihood Consequence Frequency of activity Freq of impact Benefit/Severity of impact Spatial/Population scope Duration Container delivery 1 2 2 1 2 15 Very Low Table assembly 2 3 4 1 2 35 Low Water supply 1 2 1 1 2 12 Very Low Electricity connection 1 2 1 1 2 12 Very Low Staff facilities on site 2 3 3 1 2 30 Low Rating Impact Table 1b: Impact on biodiversity of the SATO-SLC PV array on the farm Zuurwater near Aggeneys during the Construction Phase - With mitigation Impact by Likelihood Consequence Frequency of activity Freq of impact Benefit/Severity of impact Spatial/Population scope Duration Container delivery 1 2 1 1 2 12 Very Low Table assembly 2 3 3 1 2 30 Low Water supply 1 2 1 1 2 12 Very Low Electricity connection 1 2 1 1 2 12 Very Low Staff facilities on site 2 3 2 1 2 25 Very Low Rating 135
Page 1 and 2:
A vegetation and vertebrate fauna d
Page 3 and 4:
Some of the rare or beautiful succu
Page 5 and 6:
6.3.3 Field Survey ................
Page 7 and 8:
12.1 Specific mitigation measures .
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 25. The vegetation sensitivi
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 54. An easterly view from Bo
Page 13 and 14:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Vegetation Althou
Page 15 and 16:
designated sensitive areas and excl
Page 17 and 18:
Holdings (SHE, Pty Ltd). The main c
Page 19 and 20:
2. ASSIGNMENT Eco-Agent Ecological
Page 21 and 22:
3. RATIONALE It is widely recognise
Page 23 and 24:
4. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUD
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 3. Satellite image showing t
Page 27 and 28:
Topography and drainage The topogra
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 6. Close-up satellite image
Page 31 and 32:
6. METHODS Prior to the field visit
Page 33 and 34:
6.1.3 Sensitivity Only High and Low
Page 35 and 36:
• Low probability of occurrence w
Page 37 and 38:
The biodiversity significance of an
Page 39 and 40:
oth by reference to the comprehensi
Page 41 and 42:
6.4. Herpetofauna 6.4.1. Field Surv
Page 43 and 44:
• Armadillo Girdled Lizard (Cordy
Page 45 and 46:
7.2 Description of the plant commun
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 12. Stipagrostis namaquensis
Page 49 and 50:
is low, 70-110 mm per annum, mostly
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 14. Grassland on sandy hummo
Page 53 and 54:
This plant community with its speci
Page 55 and 56:
Crassula sericea Dicoma capensis Cu
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 17. A scree slope 4.2.2 Stee
Page 59 and 60:
species also occur on the mountain
Page 61 and 62:
Schmidtia kalahariensis d Stipagros
Page 63 and 64:
5.2 Washes The drainage lines withi
Page 65 and 66:
in a population going extinct elsew
Page 67 and 68:
7.4 Fine Scale Biodiversity Fine sc
Page 69 and 70:
The SKEP (2005) biodiversity map fo
Page 71 and 72:
National Herbarium. This is therefo
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 26. A map indicating the Bla
Page 75 and 76:
7.10 References Acocks, J.P.H. 1988
Page 78 and 79:
8. RESULTS: MAMMALS Acocks (1988),
Page 80 and 81:
Figure 27. A south-westerly view ov
Page 82 and 83:
8.2 Observed and Expected Mammal Sp
Page 84 and 85: √ Otocyon megalotis Bat-eared fox
Page 86 and 87: 8.4 Discussion Four pertinent matte
Page 88 and 89: Knobel, J. & Bredenkamp, G. 2005. T
Page 90 and 91: 9. RESULTS: AVIFAUNA 9.1 General Th
Page 92 and 93: Figure 33. View east from the Zuurw
Page 94 and 95: Figure 36. View north from the sout
Page 96 and 97: Figure 39. View west towards Hoedko
Page 98 and 99: Figure 42. Patch of green vegetatio
Page 100 and 101: Table 1: Rating of recognised on-si
Page 102 and 103: Burchell’s Coucal Centropus burch
Page 104 and 105: Karoo Eremomela Eremomela gregalis
Page 106 and 107: 9.4. Threatened and Red-Listed Bird
Page 108 and 109: The remaining four threatened speci
Page 110 and 111: Department of Environmental Affairs
Page 112 and 113: 10. RESULTS: HERPETOFAUNA 10.1. Her
Page 114 and 115: Figure 46. A view of red dunes and
Page 116 and 117: Figure 50. Man-made quarry on the w
Page 118 and 119: In the western corner of the study
Page 120 and 121: Very few trees occur on the study s
Page 122 and 123: Table 1: Reptile and Amphibian spec
Page 124 and 125: ? Prosymna bivittata Two-striped Sh
Page 126 and 127: Psammophis notostictus Karoo Whip o
Page 128 and 129: 10.6 Conclusions The main conservat
Page 130 and 131: 11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Page 132 and 133: assuming that the water does not ha
Page 136 and 137: Impact Table 2a:: Impact on biodive
Page 138 and 139: Substrate repair 1 2 2 1 2 15 Very
Page 140 and 141: maintenance, with designated passin
Page 142 and 143: M6: Control of plant diversity/stru
Page 144 and 145: Some Red Data plants and animals oc
Page 146 and 147: Flora Some areas of infrastructure
Page 148 and 149: (increasing or decreasing with time
Page 150 and 151: Table 2: Significance Rating Matrix
Page 152 and 153: APPENDIX 2: CURRICULII VITAE Abridg
Page 154 and 155: - >150 papers at national and inter
Page 156 and 157: Visits to Israel, Italy, Germany, U
Page 158 and 159: Abridged Curriculum Vitae: Ignatius
Page 160 and 161: Abridged Curriculum Vitae: Alan Cha
Page 162 and 163: - 15 contributions in or as books
Page 164 and 165: Abridged Curriculum Vitae: Jacobus
show all

Biodiversity (1 - SRK Consulting

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?