A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education
A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education
A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In its report <strong>Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Improvement of <strong>Higher</strong> Education<br />
(Hämälä<strong>in</strong>en et al., 2002), ENQA, the European Network for Quality Assurance<br />
attempted an understand<strong>in</strong>g of the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of true benchmark<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g concrete examples and conclusions on perspectives for European<br />
benchmark<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> higher <strong>education</strong>. ENQA provides a list of 32 attributes<br />
given to benchmark<strong>in</strong>g, the ma<strong>in</strong> ones be<strong>in</strong>g collaborative/competitive, qualitative/quantitative,<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal/external, implicit/explicit, horizontal/vertical;<br />
outcome-oriented or experience-seek<strong>in</strong>g, with various purposes (standards,<br />
benchmarks, best practices) and <strong>in</strong>terests (to compare, to improve, to cooperate),<br />
depend<strong>in</strong>g on the owners of the benchmark<strong>in</strong>g exercises. The list covers<br />
many relevant factors, but does not amount to a systematic typology of<br />
approaches to benchmark<strong>in</strong>g. ENQA concluded that “good <strong>in</strong>struments are<br />
needed for useful benchmark<strong>in</strong>g exercises” and that “current benchmark<strong>in</strong>g<br />
methodologies <strong>in</strong> Europe must be improved”.<br />
A Practical Guide - <strong>Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> European <strong>Higher</strong> Education<br />
41