29.10.2014 Views

A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education

A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education

A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONCEPTS AND PRACTICES OF BENCHMARKING<br />

In Europe, benchmark<strong>in</strong>g approaches <strong>in</strong> the higher <strong>education</strong> sector have<br />

developed from the mid-1990s at the national level, either as an <strong>in</strong>itiative<br />

launched by a national body, by one or a group of higher <strong>education</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

or by an <strong>in</strong>dependent body. These usually only <strong>in</strong>volved a small number<br />

of <strong>in</strong>stitutions and were on a voluntary basis. Transnational level exercises<br />

have so far been fairly limited. These benchmark<strong>in</strong>g exercises have adopted<br />

a mixture of quantitative, qualitative and processes-oriented approaches.<br />

The degree to which these were structured depends on experience and<br />

purposes.<br />

The ESMU European <strong>Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g</strong> programme (www.esmu.be) is an example<br />

of a transnational benchmark<strong>in</strong>g exercise which goes beyond the mere<br />

comparison of data by focus<strong>in</strong>g on the effectiveness of university-wide<br />

management processes. In a collaborative way, the programme works with<br />

small groups of higher <strong>education</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions towards the identification of<br />

good practices. The method was orig<strong>in</strong>ally developed from the one used for<br />

the Malcom Baldridge National Quality Award and for the EFQM European<br />

Excellence Model.<br />

What benchmark<strong>in</strong>g is not<br />

With so many efforts to def<strong>in</strong>e ‘benchmark<strong>in</strong>g’ and with so many other terms<br />

<strong>in</strong> the conceptual neighbourhood, there is ample room for misconceptions.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, it may be useful to differentiate benchmark<strong>in</strong>g from ‘what it is not’.<br />

First, benchmark<strong>in</strong>g is not a mechanism for resource reduction (Camp 1990).<br />

Yet, after a benchmark<strong>in</strong>g exercise, resources may be redeployed <strong>in</strong> a more<br />

effective way to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>stitutional performance.<br />

Second, benchmark<strong>in</strong>g is not a panacea or programme. Ideally, it should be<br />

an ongo<strong>in</strong>g management process and have a structured methodology. Both<br />

will contribute to ensur<strong>in</strong>g impact of the benchmark<strong>in</strong>g activities. It also has<br />

to be flexible to <strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>in</strong>novative ways of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the needed <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

For that reason, a s<strong>in</strong>gle approach should not be expected.<br />

Third, benchmark<strong>in</strong>g is not a cookbook that requires only look<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>in</strong>gredients<br />

and us<strong>in</strong>g them for success. On the contrary, benchmark<strong>in</strong>g is a discovery<br />

process and a learn<strong>in</strong>g experience.<br />

44 A Practical Guide - <strong>Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> European <strong>Higher</strong> Education

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!