A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education
A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education
A prActicAl guide Benchmarking in european Higher education
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A STEP BY STEP APPROACH<br />
Choos<strong>in</strong>g the right benchmark<strong>in</strong>g approach for your<br />
purpose<br />
At the level of <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong>stitutions, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly a shift occurs from close<br />
cooperation to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g competition, and therefore more reluctance <strong>in</strong> the<br />
sector to share some types of <strong>in</strong>formation due to the obvious concern that<br />
sensitive data may be misused. This was evident <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
project as desk research only produced formal <strong>in</strong>formation of 18 collaborative<br />
benchmark<strong>in</strong>g groups on university management. However, many more<br />
higher <strong>education</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions are engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> various types of one-to-one<br />
benchmark<strong>in</strong>g approaches. In the project we were fully aware that much<br />
more benchmark<strong>in</strong>g is tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> the higher <strong>education</strong> sector, which is<br />
not advertised to a larger audience. We advocate that both one-to-one and<br />
collaborative approaches have their value <strong>in</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g out systematic and<br />
comparative data gather<strong>in</strong>g and the further steps <strong>in</strong> benchmark<strong>in</strong>g. In both<br />
cases issues of trust, confidentiality and <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g must be dealt<br />
with <strong>in</strong> a careful manner. More on this can be found <strong>in</strong> the section ‘Conduct<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a benchmark<strong>in</strong>g exercise’.<br />
At its simplest, one-to-one benchmark<strong>in</strong>g can be <strong>in</strong>itiated through active<br />
<strong>in</strong>stitutional and desk research with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitution look<strong>in</strong>g at public data<br />
available on one or several other <strong>in</strong>stitutions as a comparative exercise to<br />
produce reports for improvement.<br />
In one-to-one non-collaborative approaches, both higher <strong>education</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
enter their data <strong>in</strong> a database which already conta<strong>in</strong>s data from other<br />
higher <strong>education</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions, or those external data are contributed by the<br />
professional association/consult<strong>in</strong>g company which coord<strong>in</strong>ates the benchmark<strong>in</strong>g<br />
exercise. Once the data have been entered, higher <strong>education</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
receive a report of their scores and <strong>in</strong>formation on where they are<br />
positioned aga<strong>in</strong>st the competition. They then have the option to obta<strong>in</strong><br />
expert advice from the database owner which will help them progress and<br />
achieve higher levels of performance.<br />
58 A Practical Guide - <strong>Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> European <strong>Higher</strong> Education