02.11.2014 Views

7754 Vol 2 Flyleaf - ICAO Public Maps

7754 Vol 2 Flyleaf - ICAO Public Maps

7754 Vol 2 Flyleaf - ICAO Public Maps

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

III-F1<br />

Attachment E<br />

IMPACT OF OPERATIONS OF<br />

SPECIFIC AEROPLANES ON AERODROMES<br />

(Paragraph 98, Part III — AOP of the EUR Basic ANP refers)<br />

ANNEX 14, VOLUME I<br />

1. With the introduction of the B 747-400, the<br />

Council of <strong>ICAO</strong> adopted 65 m as the upper limit of wing<br />

span for code letter E in Table 3-1 of Annex 14, <strong>Vol</strong>ume I.<br />

This table includes the requirements for the physical<br />

characteristics of aerodromes such as increased separation<br />

distances between runway and parallel taxiway, parallel<br />

taxiways, taxiway to object and aircraft stand taxilane to<br />

object, as shown below:<br />

SURVEY ON B 747-400 OPERATIONS<br />

IN THE <strong>ICAO</strong> EUROPEAN REGION<br />

3. A regional survey on B 747-400 operations at<br />

international aerodromes was conducted by the European<br />

Office of <strong>ICAO</strong> in October 1989.<br />

RESULTS OF THE <strong>ICAO</strong> SURVEY<br />

4. The <strong>ICAO</strong> survey:<br />

Code<br />

letter<br />

RWY/<br />

TWY<br />

distance<br />

TWY/<br />

TWY<br />

distance<br />

TWY/<br />

object<br />

distance<br />

Taxilane/<br />

object<br />

distance<br />

— highlights the main problems/concerns raised by NLA<br />

(B747-400) operations;<br />

E<br />

182.5 m<br />

(180.0 m)<br />

80 m<br />

(76.5 m)<br />

47.5 m<br />

(46.5 m)<br />

42.5 m<br />

(40.0 m)<br />

— indicates that lower separation distances, used at some<br />

major aerodromes, do not effect the safety of NLA<br />

operations.<br />

(Distances in brackets refer to those approved by<br />

Amendment 38 to Annex 14.)<br />

2. Lower separation distances at an existing<br />

aerodrome may be permitted if an aeronautical study<br />

indicates that such lower separation distances, together with<br />

the conditional implementation of specific measures, would<br />

not effect the safety and the regularity of operations of<br />

aeroplanes.<br />

Note.— Guidance on relevant factors which may be<br />

considered in an aeronautical study is given in the<br />

Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2 (Doc 9157).<br />

5. The “<strong>ICAO</strong> Survey” showed the NLA-related<br />

problems concerning terminal, apron and manoeuvring area<br />

as well as the reduced separation distances, used at some<br />

aerodromes.<br />

TERMINAL (Building)<br />

6. Terminal limitations such as check-in concourse,<br />

waiting lounge, customs, security, baggage claim area, gate<br />

occupancy, car parking, access roads, etc., are related to<br />

passenger capacity of aircraft. Hence the B 747-300 (wing<br />

span 60 m) problems occurring at airports are not B<br />

747-400 (NLA)-related.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!