Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

fuels is allegedly warming the planet. This hypothesis couldn't stand the test of an eighth
grade science fair. And if you dare poke holes in the hypothesis you're branded a 'denier,‘‖
Sussman told EPW on January 3, 2008. ―Well fine. I'd rather be called a 'denier' than try to
push a scheme that would make Karl Marx green with envy,‖ Sussman added.
Meteorologist Allen Barr, who holds a masters degree in Meteorologist, refuted climate
fears in a talk to Montana lawmakers in 2008 According to a March 2, 2008, article, Barr
said he didn‘t ―think human behavior was behind global warming.‖ (LINK)
Environmental scientist Dr. Kenneth P. Green of the American Enterprise Institute
refuted man-made climate fears in 2008. ―While I believe that Earth has experienced a
mild, non-enhanced greenhouse warming which will continue in the foreseeable future, I
think the chaotic nature of the climate system makes projections of the future climate no
better than science fiction,‖ Green wrote EPW on March 6, 2008. ―I am intensely skeptical
of the entire process of predictive climate modeling, from its ability to meaningfully predict
the climate in the future, to its ability to tell us how much of activity A would result in
climate change B. These models have so many parameters that can be arbitrarily ‗tuned‘ as
to make them little more than a tool for mathematizing the fantasy scenarios of the
programmers who set up and run the programs,‖ Green explained. (LINK)
Chemist and process engineer Ferdinand Engelbeen spoke out in 2008 against dire
global warming predictions. ―Why ‗skeptical‘? As I have some experience with models, be
it in chemical processes, not climate, I know how difficult it is to even make a model of a
simple process where most, if not all, physico-chemical parameters and equations are
exactly known,‖ Engelbeen wrote on his website in November 1, 2008. ―To make a
climate model, where a lot of parameters and reactions are not even known to any
accuracy, for me seems a little bit overblown. And to speak of any predictive power of such
models, which are hardly validated, is as scientific as looking into a crystal ball,‖ he
explained. ―Kyoto in my opinion is a waste of money which will cost much without any
benefit,‖ he added. (LINK)
Frank Wachowski, a retired atmospheric scientist for the National Weather Service,
rejected the notion of a consensus about global warming in 2008. ―The jury is still out,‖
Wachowski said, according to a March 19, 2008 article. ―Obviously, it appears that the
Arctic is getting warmer and causing problems for polar bears and other animals. But are
we doing it? It has become a big political issue,‖ Wachowski explained. ―We don‘t have a
long-enough period to study yet…everything goes through cycles,‖ he concluded. (LINK)
U.S. Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane
Research Division of NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) in
Miami strongly protested the notion that most scientists agree with man-made climate
change theories in 2008. ―It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is
only a fringe of scientists who don‘t buy into anthropogenic global warming,‖ Goldenberg
said on August 18, 2008. ―Not all scientists agree that the warming we‘ve seen is
necessarily anthropogenic,‖ Goldenberg added. ―There are those who want to attribute any
perceived increase in natural disasters to anthropomorphic global warming. I predict that if
we have an active hurricane season, someone will attribute it to AGW. They‘re not really
looking at the science; they‘re looking at the disaster,‖ he added. Goldenberg also praised
the skeptical climate change conference in New York City in March 2008. ―The fact is that
112