Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

using various EPA models, declared his climate skepticism. ―I have a masters in physics
and over 33 years‘ working in the fields of environmental science, monitoring air quality
and overseeing modeling analyses from permit models to hazardous release impact
models. Were I to submit such fraudulent types of reports to my clients or to the federal or
state regulatory agencies I would be kicked out of my company. Too bad folks like
[NASA‘s] James Hansen can continue lying at taxpayers' expense in efforts that will line
his and Al Gore‘s pockets. Follow the money!‖ Fowler told the Environment and Public
Works Committee on December 10, 2009. ―I am one of the 32,000+ signers of [skeptical
declaration] the Oregon Petition. Please keep fighting this zealous, destructive, anticapitalist
garbage. There are more than 650 skeptics...some just won't speak out for fear of
retribution,‖ Fowler explained. (LINK)
Award-winning Aerospace and Mechanical Engineer Dr. Gregory W. Moore, who has
authored or co-authored more than 75 publications, book chapters, and reports, and
authored the 2001 Version of the NASA Space Science Technology Plan which
included a comprehensive approach to studying the Sun-Earth connection aspect of
space-based research and was honored by the U.S. Department of Commerce for its
International Scientist Recognition. Moore also received a special recommendation of
the U.S. Senate for his work related to protection of the environment. Moore,
formerly a university professor, scientist of the U.S. Government lab, managing editor
of an international scientific journal, member of the New York Academy of Sciences,
and senior member of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
rejected the notion that there is a consensus on man-made climate claims in 2009. ―There
is definitely no sufficient data which would create a basis for making any kind of
conclusions either way,‖ Moore wrote to the Senate Environment and Public Works
Committee on January 10, 2009. ―There is no sufficient data in existence anywhere which
would allow for making any kind of definite statements on the effect of natural
mechanisms on the global warming phenomenon,‖ Moore explained. ―The data which is
used to date for making the conclusions and predictions on global warming are so rough
and primitive, compared to what‘s needed, and so unreliable that they are not even worth
mentioning by respectful scientists,‖ Moore added.
Retired U.S. Air Force (USAF) Meteorologist William “Bill” Lyons, formerly of the
USAF‟s Global Weather Central at Strategic Air Command (SAC) Headquarters
where he served at “the leading edge of designing and implementing computer
techniques for global weather modeling in support of SAC operations.” Lyons publicly
declared his skepticism in 2009. ―I decry the creation of the fear mentality which many
seem to use to prevent rational study and encourage irrational actions. I am pleased to be
considered a ‗denier‘ in this cause if this puts me in the class with those who defied
prevailing ‗scientific consensus‘ that the earth was flat and that the earth was the not the
center of the universe,‖ Lyons told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Minority office on March 5, 2009. ―My experience, and that of those around me, taught me
to be cautious of any predictive model which could not be verified. Other activities ongoing
at the time made it clear to me how monumental is the energy in our climate system, and
taught me to be cautious of the value of human efforts to control the weather,‖ Lyons
explained. ―Global warming and cooling are realities that have occurred in cycles which
began when our atmosphere was formed. The forces involved in weather systems are
difficult to comprehend, and the sources of the factors which influence warming/cooling
145