05.11.2014 Views

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chemist Dr. Grant Miles, author of numerous scientific publications who was elected<br />

to a Fellowship of the Royal Institute of Chemistry, was a member of UK Atomic<br />

Energy Authority Chemical Separation Plant Committee. Miles, who was recognized<br />

for his scientific contributions by direct election to Fellowship of the UK‟s Royal<br />

Institute of Chemistry, chastised the UN IPCC for its global warming claims. ―There is no<br />

credible evidence of the current exceptional global warming trumpeted by the IPCC and<br />

there can be no such thing as an average world temperature,‖ Miles wrote in November<br />

2008. ―The IPCC is no longer behaving as an investigative scientific organization or<br />

pretending to be one. It is now showing its true colors in its use of fantasy and propaganda<br />

to advance its environmental socialist agenda. Environmentalism has become a quasireligion,‖<br />

Miles wrote. ―It is not becoming clear to scientists that in identifying the<br />

complete falsity of the IPCC‘s pronouncements they are seeing the work of an organization<br />

that used pseudo-science to promote an ideology. Their leaders betrayed the trust of the<br />

world community. They have no interest in the genuine investigation of the complex<br />

factors involved in long-term climate change. The IPCC should be abolished and climate<br />

research left to existing reputable research organizations,‖ he wrote. (LINK)<br />

Geologist Dr. Lloyd C. Furer, a past Associate Scientist and Visiting Professor at<br />

Indiana University and who served as a meteorologist for the U.S. Air Force, has<br />

authored more than 35 publications and declared his skepticism in 2009. ―I have been<br />

told that there is a list of about 650 scientists who have doubts the human-produced CO2<br />

has little or nothing do with the current global warming. You can certainly list me as a<br />

skeptic,‖ Furer wrote to wrote to Environment & Public Works Committee on February 3,<br />

2009, requesting to be added to the dissenting scientist report. ―I've been exposed to<br />

climate change in the geologic record many times in the past 40 years and I have a strong<br />

interest in climate change possibly as a result of starting my science career in the USAF Air<br />

Weather Service during the Korean War,‖ Furer explained. ―The past two winters here in<br />

Wisconsin (Ft. Atkinson) leads me to believe that we have entered a cycle of global<br />

cooling!‖ he added. (LINK)<br />

Physicist and environmental activist John Droz, Jr., who holds a graduate degree in<br />

physics from Syracuse University, wrote an analysis of global warming in January 2009.<br />

―As a physicist and environmental activist, I applaud your efforts to educate the public<br />

about the <strong>Global</strong> Warming issue,‖ Droz wrote to Environment & Public Works Committee<br />

on January 28, 2009. ―The negative consequences of going down this scientifically<br />

unresolved path are almost unfathomable,‖ Droz added. ―‗<strong>Global</strong> Warming‘ is still a<br />

scientifically unresolved matter,‖ he explained. ―What concerns me most is that our<br />

national energy policies are being driven by the assumption that this hypothesis is true.<br />

There is considerable scientific evidence that contradicts the assumptions and conclusions<br />

of this theory. Unfortunately, the main proponents of the <strong>Global</strong> Warming Theory have not<br />

been able to provide scientific explanations for these contradictions. This seriously<br />

undermines the validity of their position. Worse, when contradicting scientific evidence is<br />

presented, the presenters are often characterized as ‗non-believers,‘ ‗deniers,‘ or worse,‖<br />

Droz wrote. ―There are other theories that have been put forth by very qualified scientists,<br />

and these alternative explanations are supported by significant scientific data. These other<br />

theories also have their weak points, but the fact is that they do explain some facets of the<br />

Climate Change situation better than the <strong>Global</strong> Warming Theory does,‖ he concluded.<br />

(LINK)<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!