Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that this is a problem," Tripp said.
"Because there is natural variability in the weather, you cannot statistically know for
another 150 years. ... There are indications, there are options, but if you are looking for
hard scientific facts, you are still a long ways away." (LINK) (LINK) [Note: Tripp was
lead author of subsection 4.5 in Volume 3 (Industrial Processes and Product Use)]
NASA Scientist Dr. Leonard Weinstein worked 35 years at the NASA Langley
Research Center and finished his career there as a Senior Research Scientist.
Weinstein, who is presently a Senior Research Fellow at the National Institute of
Aerospace, totally rejected global warming claims. ―Any reasonable scientific analysis
must conclude the basic theory wrong!!‖ Weinstein wrote on April 23, 2009. ―The final
question that arises is what prediction has the AGW made that has been demonstrated,
and that strongly supports the theory. It appears that there is NO real supporting evidence
and much disagreeing evidence for the AGW theory as proposed. That is not to say there
is no effect from Human activity. Clearly human pollution (not greenhouse gases) is a
problem. There is also almost surely some contribution to the present temperature from
the increase in CO 2 and CH 4 , but it seems to be small and not a driver of future climate,‖
Weinstein wrote. (LINK) (LINK) (LINK)
Nobel Prize-Winning Stanford University Physicist Dr. Robert B. Laughlin, won
the Nobel Prize for physics in 1998, and was formerly a research scientist at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, rejected global warming orthodoxy in
2010. ―Please remain calm: The Earth will heal itself -- Climate is beyond our power to
control...Earth doesn't care about governments or their legislation,‖ Laughlin wrote in
July 2010 in The American Scholar. Earth has suffered ―all manner of other abuses
greater than anything people could inflict. Yet, the Earth is still here. It's a
survivor...Earth doesn't care whether you turn off your AC, refrigerator and TV. It
doesn't notice when you turn down your thermostat and drive a hybrid car,‖ Laughlin
wrote. ―You can't find much actual global warming in present-day weather
observations,‖ he added. ―Climate change is a matter of geologic time, something that
the earth routinely does on its own without asking anyone's permission or explaining
itself,‖ Laughlin explained. He continued: ―Global warming forecasts have the further
difficulty that you can‘t find much actual global warming in present-day weather
observations. In principle, changes in climate should show up in rainfall statistics,
hurricane frequency, temperature records, and so forth. As a practical matter they don‘t,
because weather patterns are dominated by large multi-year events in the oceans, such
as the El Niño Southern Oscillation and the North Pacific Gyre Oscillation, which have
nothing to do with climate change. In order to test the predictions, you‘d have to
separate these big effects from subtle, inexorable changes on scales of centuries, and
nobody knows how to do that yet.‖ (LINK) (LINK) (LINK) (LINK)
Russian Scientist Dr. Anatoly Levitin, the head of geomagnetic variations laboratory
at the Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation
of the Russian Academy of Sciences who has published numerous peer-reviewed
studies about the interaction of solar radiation with the Earth‟s magnetic field,
rejected man-made global warming claims in 2010. When asked in a July 15, 2010
interview if climate change is not man-made, Levitin responded: “Exactly; climate
change is a physical process. Climate is in fact like the Earth‘s energy budget. The Earth
12