Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has "co-opted" the green movement.<br />
(LINK) ]<br />
Senior Chemist Glenn Speck of the Oklahoma City Isotek Environmental Lab, who<br />
has over 35 years of laboratory experience in the government and private sectors,<br />
testing air, water, fuel, and soil for pollutants and other chemicals, including CO2,<br />
dissented from man-made climate fears in 2007. “Although much of the liberal press and<br />
the liberal politicians endorse man-made global warming as a complete, irrefutable reality,<br />
there are a substantial number of us scientists that strongly disagree. There is little<br />
disagreement that some warming has likely occurred, but many of us think that most, if not<br />
all of that change is due to natural planetary processes,‖ Speck wrote in a June 14, 2007<br />
letter. ―The public has been repeatedly misled that there is a scientific consensus on global<br />
warming. Totally false. Unfortunately, man-made climate change, or anthropogenic global<br />
warming as it‘s more commonly known, has become a political issue rather than a<br />
scientific one. Those who want you to accept that humans have caused climate change have<br />
a not-so-hidden agenda of imposing carbon taxes here in the United States that will cripple<br />
our economy and make us even more unable to compete with other nations,‖ Speck<br />
explained. ―Those of us who don‘t believe the anthropogenic global warming claims also<br />
have to live on this planet, and we want it environmentally in good condition for our<br />
children and grandchildren. We can and should be better stewards of our ecosystems,‖ he<br />
added. (LINK)<br />
Professor emeritus of aerospace engineering Vincent U. Muirhead, who researched<br />
and taught at the University of Kansas in the area of gas dynamics for 28 years, and<br />
also developed a laboratory model of a tornado, declared his climate change dissent in<br />
2008. ―The new green left (environmentalist) propaganda reminds me of the old red left<br />
(communist) propaganda. The dirty word is now carbon rather than capitalism. The game is<br />
simply to intrude and control everything. How much will the carbon tax be for each of us to<br />
breathe?‖ Muirhead wrote in the Kansas City Star on June 8, 2008. ―I concur with Bill<br />
McAllister‘s letter, ‗The climate-warming game,‘‖ Muirhead wrote. ―There are six<br />
equations that describe a gas dynamics problem: the equation of state, and five nonlinear<br />
differential equations expressing the conservation of mass, momentum and energy. Key to<br />
these for the atmosphere are: 1. the future flow of heat from the sun as a function of time<br />
and space and 2. the absorbent and reflective nature of the atmosphere as a function of time<br />
and space. We don‘t have a clue about these. For any computer model to produce answers,<br />
many extremely questionable assumptions must be made. As McAllister noted, ‗Why can‘t<br />
the current scientific models accurately predict next week‘s weather?‘‖ he asked. (LINK) &<br />
(LINK)<br />
Prominent Hungarian Physicist and environmental researcher Dr. Miklós Zágoni<br />
reversed his view of man-made warming and is now a skeptic. Zágoni was once<br />
Hungary‘s most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol. After researching climate<br />
issues further he converted to a man-made global warming skeptic. After studying the<br />
theory developed by Hungarian Ferenc Miskolczi, an atmospheric physicist with 30 years<br />
of experience and a former researcher with NASA's Ames Research Center, Zágoni<br />
stopped calling global warming a crisis, and has instead focused on presenting the new<br />
theory to other climatologists, the March 6, 2008, article in Daily Tech reported. Zágoni<br />
wrote to EPW on May 3, 2008, "The present-day greenhouse theory is incorrect in the<br />
90