Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

eceives most energy from the Sun and some energy from its depths – as we see in
earthquakes and other reactions taking place deep inside the Earth. That energy warms
the oceans that store the warmth on the Earth‘s surface. This is a kind of energy budget
consisting of elements that come and go.‖ Levitin continued: ―The energy mankind
generates is so small compared to that overall energy budget that it simply cannot affect
the climate. However, the energy budget is very under-studied because there is only a
small range of observations used to measure it. This is a very complicated process. Today
we cannot measure it with 99% accuracy. Our current measurements are only 10%-15%
accurate. The change must be at least 1% to change the climate. The planet‘s climate is
doing its own thing, but we cannot pinpoint significant trends in changes to it because it
dates back millions of years while the study of it began only recently. Some processes
take seconds and other years. You cannot check man‘s state of health in a matter of
seconds; the process could take a fortnight and even then the result will not be definitive.
The same goes for climate change. We are children of the Sun; we simply lack data to
draw the proper conclusions.‖ (LINK)
Brazilian Geologist Geraldo Luís Lino, who authored the 2009 book “The Global
Warming Fraud: How a Natural Phenomenon Was Converted into a False World
Emergency,” rejected man-made climate claims in 2010. Luis Lino declared it ―global
warming fraud‖ and called climate fears an ―imaginary threat.‖ ―AGW has been
forcefully imposed by means of a barrage of scare stories and indoctrination that begins
in the elementary school textbooks,‖ he wrote on November 14, 2010. ―Hundreds of
billion dollars have been wasted with the attempt of imposing a (AGW) theory that is not
supported by physical world evidences,‖ he added. ―History offers a gloomy precedent
of such poisoning of science by ideology and special interests: the infamous Lysenko
affair in the former Soviet Union, the ruthless opposition to genetics headed by Trofim D.
Lysenko and his cohorts between 1930s and 1960s...the physical elimination of stubborn
scientists who resisted the 'consensual official line' (the ‗skeptics‘ of the time)',‖ he
added. (LINK) (LINK) (LINK)
Chemistry Professor Dr. Mary Mumper, the chair of the Chemistry Department at
Frostburg State University in Maryland, who has published several peer-reviewed
studies about biochemistry, declared her dissent from man-made global warming
fears during an April 2009 Earth Day presentation titled Anthropogenic Carbon
Dioxide and Global Warming, the Skeptic's View. "I am an environmentalist," Mumper
said on April 30, 2009, but "I must disagree with Mr. Gore." According to the April 29,
2009 article in the University's newspaper The Bottom Line, Mumper said, "We need to
take care of our planet," and disagreed with the idea of putting all research money into
CO2 abatement. ―In my skeptic's mind, that is foolish,‖ she said during her presentation.
Mumper ―believes that announcements such as Gore's, saying that the debate over
climate change is over are false.‖ ―Mumper's presentation explained that the global
warming skeptic tends to accept that mankind plays a role in warming the earth, both
through greenhouse gas, and especially urbanization, but the lack of warming in rural
areas suggests that the greenhouse gas component is overblown.‖ According to the
article, Mumper also explained that ―Gore's message, as well as that of the IPCC, states
that anthropogenic (man-made) carbon dioxide gas is responsible for warming the planet,
and is leading the planet to become an unlivable place for mankind. Mumper explained to
13