05.11.2014 Views

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

natural variability caused in large part by changes in solar energy output. Acknowledgment<br />

of this true science is critical to implementation of much-needed practical measures for<br />

increasing domestic energy and world food supplies,‖ he added. (LINK) (LINK)<br />

Atmospheric Scientist Timothy R. Minnich, who has more than 30 years experience in<br />

the design and management of a wide range of air quality investigations for industry<br />

and government, specializes in the application of optical remote sensing (ORS) to a<br />

wide range of air-related issues. Minnich has worked with EPA as a Superfund<br />

contractor, is co-founder of Minnich and Scotto, Inc., a full-service air quality<br />

consulting firm. Minnich holds a masters degree in meteorology and taught courses at<br />

Rutgers University and University of Michigan. He is a past member of the American<br />

Meteorological Society, specializes in issues like acid rain and ozone, and has<br />

authored or co-authored numerous technical publications and reports. ―I choose to<br />

take President-elect Obama at his word when, upon his appointment of John Holdren as<br />

director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, he promised to<br />

‗[protect] free and open inquiry . . . ensuring that facts and evidence are never twisted or<br />

obscured by politics or ideology,‘‖ Minnich told EPW on December 22, 2008. Clearly the<br />

best means to fulfill on this commitment is to appoint to the Council of Advisors on<br />

Science and Technology, over which Dr. Holdren will preside, several of the more than 650<br />

distinguished and renowned scientists who have openly questioned the ―consensus‖ on<br />

AGW in Senator Inhofe‘s 2008 U.S. Senate Minority Report,‖ Minnich explained. ―The<br />

late Michael Crichton said it well: ‗Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first<br />

refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already<br />

settled. . . . Let‘s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus<br />

[which] is the business of politics. . . . What is relevant is reproducible results. The<br />

greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus,‘‖<br />

Minnich added. (LINK) (LINK)<br />

Certified consulting meteorologist Anthony J. Sadar, co-author of Environmental Risk<br />

Communication: Principles and Practices for Industry, dissented from man-made climate<br />

fears in 2009. ―Everyone has been conditioned to believe that an extremely complex<br />

climate system is largely controlled by a single simple gas - carbon dioxide - even though<br />

the biggest single climate regulator on Earth is most likely water,‖ Sadar wrote on February<br />

23, 2009. ―The global atmospheric temperature is substantially controlled by water in all its<br />

forms, as invisible vapor in air, as liquid in oceans and clouds, and as solid ice crystals,<br />

snow cover, and glaciers,‖ Sadar explained. ―<strong>Man</strong>y in the environmental profession have<br />

come to an epiphany like the one the late Michael Crichton had - that contemporary<br />

environmentalism, with its authoritative, unchallengeable proclamations and rigid tenets, is<br />

analogous to organized religion. This environmental religion is headed by politicians (or<br />

former politicians) as the high priests and an established political cathedral (read<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Besides, could other uncontrollable factors<br />

like variation in incoming solar radiation and cosmic rays, as some atmospheric scientists<br />

have proposed, have a dominant influence over climate? So, before we all surrender to a<br />

calamitous climate change scenario, let's put it into perspective with the very real presentday<br />

calamities of mass starvation, disease, ethnic cleansing, potential economic collapses,<br />

and the like. With these exceptionally serious challenges at hand and based on the<br />

enormous complexity of the Earth-climate system and the relative paucity of knowledge<br />

scientists have about the systems operation, we sincerely hope to encourage a return to<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!