05.11.2014 Views

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Senior Meteorologist Dr. Wolfgang P. Thuene was a former analyst and forecaster for<br />

the German Weather Service in the field of synoptic meteorology and also worked for<br />

the German Environmental Protection Agency. Thuene currently works in the<br />

Ministry of Environment and Forests of Rheinland-Pfalz. Thuene rejected the idea that<br />

mankind is driving global warming. ―All temperature and weather observations indicate<br />

that the earth isn‘t like a greenhouse and that there is in reality no ‗natural greenhouse<br />

effect‘ which could warm up the earth by its own emitted energy and cause by re-emission<br />

a ‗global warming effect‘. With or without atmosphere every body looses heat, gets<br />

inevitably colder. This natural fact, formulated by Sir Isaac Newton in his ‗cooling law‘,<br />

led Sir James Dewar to the construction of the ‗Dewar flask‘ to minimize heat losses from<br />

a vessel. But the most perfect thermos flask can‘t avoid that the hot coffee really gets cold.<br />

The hypothesis of a natural and a man-made ‗greenhouse effect‘, like eugenics, belongs to<br />

the category ‗scientific errors,‖ Thuene wrote on February 24, 2007. ―The infrared<br />

thermography is a smoking gun proof that the IPCC-hypothesis cannot be right. The<br />

atmosphere does not act like the glass of a greenhouse which primarily hinders the<br />

convection! The atmosphere has an open radiation window between 8 and 14 microns and<br />

is therefore transparent to infrared heat from the earth‘s surface. This window cannot be<br />

closed by the distinctive absorption lines of CO2 at 4.3 and 15 microns. Because the<br />

atmosphere is not directly heated by the Sun but indirectly by the surface the earth loses<br />

warmth also by conduction with the air and much more effectively by vertical convection<br />

of the air to a very great part by evaporation and transpiration. Nearly thirty percent of the<br />

solar energy is used for evaporation and distributed as latent energy through the<br />

atmosphere,‖ Thuene wrote. ―Summarizing we can say: Earth‘s surface gains heat from the<br />

Sun, is warmed up and loses heat by infrared radiation. While the input of heat by solar<br />

radiation is restricted to the daytime hours, the outgoing terrestrial radiation is a nonstop<br />

process during day and night and depends only on the body temperature and the emissivity.<br />

Therefore after sunset the earth continuous to radiate and therefore cools off. Because the<br />

air is in physical contact with the ground it also cools off, the vertical temperature profile<br />

changes, and we get a so called surface inversion which inhibits convection,‖ Thuene<br />

explained. (LINK)<br />

Chemist and Nuclear Engineer Robert DeFayette was formerly with NASA‟s Plum<br />

Brook Reactor in Ohio and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) at its<br />

headquarters office near Washington, DC. DeFayette, who earned a masters degree in<br />

Physical Chemistry, also worked at the NRC‟s Regional Office near Chicago where he<br />

was a Director of the Enforcement staff. He also served as a consultant to the<br />

Department of Energy. DeFayette wrote a critique of former Vice President Al Gore's<br />

book, An Inconvenient Truth, in 2007. ―I freely admit I am a skeptic,‖ DeFayette told EPW<br />

on January 15, 2008. ―I take umbrage in so-called ‗experts‘ using data without checking<br />

their sources. My scientific background taught me to question things that do not appear to<br />

be right (e.g.-if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is). That is one reason I went to<br />

such detail in critiquing Gore's book. I also strongly object to the IPCC and its use of socalled<br />

‗experts,‘‖ DeFayette explained. In his March 14, 2007 critique of Gore, DeFayette<br />

dismissed Gore‘s claim that ―the survival of our civilization‖ is at stake. DeFayette wrote,<br />

―Nonsense! Civilization may one day cease to exist but it won‘t be from global warming<br />

caused by CO2. I can think of many more promising scenarios such as disease, nuclear<br />

war; volcanic eruptions; ice ages; meteor impacts; solar heating.‖ DeFayette asserted that<br />

Gore‘s book was ―a political, not scientific, book. There is absolutely no discussion about<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!