Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Nobel Prize Winner for Physics in 1973, Ivar Giaever, a fellow of the American<br />
Physical Society, declared himself a dissenter in 2008. ―I am a skeptic,‖ Giaever<br />
announced in June 2008. ―<strong>Global</strong> warming has become a new religion,‖ Giaever added. ―I<br />
am Norwegian, should I really worry about a little bit of warming? I am unfortunately<br />
becoming an old man. We have heard many similar warnings about the acid rain 30 years<br />
ago and the ozone hole 10 years ago or deforestation but the humanity is still around. The<br />
ozone hole width has peaked in 1993,‖ he continued. ―Moreover, global warming has<br />
become a new religion. We frequently hear about the number of scientists who support it.<br />
But the number is not important: only whether they are correct is important. We don't really<br />
know what the actual effect on the global temperature is. There are better ways to spend the<br />
money,‖ he added. (LINK) (LINK) (LINK)<br />
Climatologist Dr. Richard Keen, who is a lecturer in the Department of Atmospheric<br />
and Oceanic Sciences at the University of Colorado, a member of the American<br />
Meteorological Society, and has worked with the National Center for Atmospheric<br />
Research, dissented in 2008. Keen specializes in volcanic aerosols and climate change<br />
studies and wrote the book Skywatch: The Western Weather Guide. Keen‘s 2008 global<br />
warming PowerPoint asking ―Inconvenient Questions‖ was featured on October 14, 2008,<br />
on former Colorado State climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke‘s Sr. website. (LINK) According<br />
to Keen, global warming ranges between a ―minor inconvenience that‘s overblown‖ or<br />
―nothing – it doesn‘t exist‖ or ―a good thing.‖ ―Earth has cooled since 1998,‖ Keen noted,<br />
―in defiance of the predictions by the UN-IPCC.‖ According to Keen, ―The global<br />
temperature for 2007 was the coldest in a decade and the coldest of the millennium.‖ After<br />
noting the recent cooling temps, Keen wrote ―which is why ‗global warming‘ is now called<br />
‗climate change.‘‖ Keen also pointed out that the most Antarctic sea ice on record was<br />
recorded in 2007 and then he rhetorically asked: ―Did you see [that fact] reported in the<br />
news?‖ ―U.S. carbon emission growth rate has slowed to 0.2 % per year since 2000,‖ Keen<br />
wrote. Keen concludes his PowerPoint by stating: ―Enjoy the warm climate while it lasts,<br />
and please make enough CO2 to feed a tree.‖ (LINK) & (LINK)<br />
Finnish Scientist Dr. Jarl R. Ahlbeck is lecturer of environmental technology and a<br />
chemical engineer at Abo Akademi University in Finland and has authored 200<br />
scientific publications and was former Greenpeace member. ―The theory of how carbon<br />
dioxide influences the global mean temperature is complicated and unreliable… so far, real<br />
measurements give no ground for concern about a catastrophic future warming,‖ Ahlbeck<br />
wrote in a October 8, 2008 paper titled ―No Significant <strong>Global</strong> Warming Sine 1995.‖ ―It<br />
has been widely discussed if the satellite-derived global temperature measurements that<br />
show only little warming should be more reliable than the temperatures obtained on the<br />
ground that show more warming. But after 1995 both sources show about the same. A good<br />
reason to start a diagram from 1995 is that since that year no big (cooling) volcano<br />
eruptions have disturbed the temperature trend. Contrary to common belief, there has been<br />
no or little global warming since 1995 and this is shown by two completely independent<br />
datasets. The curves look very normal and it seems probable that the natural recovery from<br />
the little ice age has went on without any significant decelerations or accelerations caused<br />
by human activity. It is impossible to say what is going to happen in the future. But so far,<br />
real measurements give no ground for concern about a catastrophic future warming,‖<br />
Ahlbeck explained. (LINK) (LINK) [Note: <strong>Man</strong>y other scientists who are also progressive<br />
89