Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). Cooler PDO phases usually last 21 to 25 years, so we<br />
should be quite chilly as a planet until at least 2030, maybe longer. Remember, I have<br />
another cycle of intense global warming, as I mentioned at our March 2, 2007 climate<br />
seminar at the Coeur d'Alene Re sort, due by 2031 to 2038, when all of my major cycles<br />
'collide in chaos,‘‖ he added. (LINK) (LINK)<br />
Consulting Chemist and Forensic Scientist Dr. Jim Sprott of Auckland, NZ dissented<br />
from the climate change ―consensus‖ in 2008. ―The projections of the IPCC are simplistic,<br />
superficial, and now proven wrong. The whole issue requires a fresh start, based on the<br />
mass of irrefutable data which has been assembled,‖ Sprott wrote in an analysis on<br />
November 18, 2008. ―The much-vaunted IPCC scenarios are patently wrong. The manmade<br />
climate change proposition fails. And with it fails the whole panjandrum of carbon<br />
trading,‖ Sprott added. ―The postulated connection between atmospheric temperature and<br />
atmospheric CO2 has broken down, and therefore the ―greenhouse gas‖ proposition has<br />
failed. The disparity between the IPCC prediction and observed data continues to widen,<br />
and no amount of rhetoric can alter this,‖ he added. (LINK)<br />
Geologist Marc Hendrickx, a professional geologist working to assess geologic risks<br />
and currently obtaining his PhD rejected man-made global warming fears in 2008.<br />
―We're not scared anymore Mr. Gore!‖ declares Hendrickx‘s new 2008 parody book A<br />
Climate Change Story For Little Skeptics. ―The contention that recent rises in global<br />
temperature as measured by satellites are due solely to increased concentrations of CO2<br />
from anthropogenic sources is misplaced. Temperature rises due to CO2 emissions have<br />
already been accounted for and input of additional CO2 will not result in increased global<br />
temperatures on their own. This is due to the logarithmic relationship between CO2 and<br />
temperature. This relationship explains why carbon dioxide levels have been much higher<br />
during past geological eras and have not resulted in run away greenhouse conditions,‖<br />
Hendrickx wrote to EPW on November 21, 2008. ―Computer models are often cited as<br />
providing evidence that warming is entirely caused by CO2, however computers models do<br />
not constitute evidence. Computer models have not been able to predict temperature<br />
changes over the last 20 years and even the IPCC admit that long term prediction of future<br />
climate states is not possible. Why would anyone rely on current computer models to<br />
predict climate 100 years into the future given their obvious limitations?‖ Hendrickx asked.<br />
―Arguments in favor of AGW based on the notion of ‗consensus‘ are not valid. It only<br />
takes one fact to falsify a theory,‖ he added. (LINK) (LINK)<br />
Associate Professor of Chemistry R. John Muench of Heartland Community College<br />
in Illinois dissented in 2008. ―<strong>Global</strong> warming alarmism is more religion than science. The<br />
believers have their messiah, Al Gore, who is not a scientist and has refused all monetary<br />
offers to debate the science,‖ Muench wrote on November 27, 2008, in an article titled<br />
―Natural cycles cause global warming, cooling.‖ ―Current data does not support that any<br />
warming is occurring. Satellite data shows that temperatures have been steady for the last<br />
10 years and nowhere near the projections cited by‖ proponents,‖ Muench wrote. ―After<br />
examining [Climatologist Dr. Roy] Spencer's work, I am convinced that observed climate<br />
changes are mostly natural. Unlike the believers who refuse all debate, I would welcome<br />
any opportunity to present my evidence,‖ he added. (LINK) (LINK)<br />
133